Endnotes

 ^1. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.agency.sog.convention.1983/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^2. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.agency.convention.1978/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^3. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.minimum.standards.shipping.agents.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^4. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.sog.convention.1955/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^5. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.sog.convention.1986/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^6. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/ec.applicable.law.contracts.1980/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^7. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.agency.convention.1978/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^8. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.international.commercial.contracts.principles.2004/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^9. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.international.commercial.contracts.principles.1994.commented/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^10. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.contract.principles.1994/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^11. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^12. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/leaving.the.shadow.for.the.test.of.practice.future.of.pecl.1999.friedrich.blase/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^13. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.cross.border.insolvency.model.law.1997/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^14. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.a.1982/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^15. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.b.1982/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^16. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.c.1982/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^17. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.war.1982/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^18. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.strikes.1982/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^19. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.marine.cargo.insurance.all-risks.cover.1987/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^20. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.marine.cargo.insurance.intermediate.cover.1987/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^21. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.marine.cargo.insurance.restricted.cover.1987/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^22. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.arbitration.recognition.and.enforcement.convention.new.york.1958/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^23. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/ec.jurisdiction.enforcement.judgements.civil.commercial.matters.convention.brussels.1968/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^24. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/ec.efta.jurisdiction.enforcement.judgements.civil.commercial.matters.lugano.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^25. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.limitation.period.sog.convention.1974/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^26. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.limitation.period.sog.convention.1980/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^27. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.credit.transfers.model.law.1992/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^28. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.independent.guarantees.and.standby.letters.of.credit.convention.1995/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^29. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/bills.of.exchange.and.promissory.notes.convention.1930/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^30. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.bills.of.exchange.and.promissory.notes.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^31. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.factoring.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^32. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.financial.leasing.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^33. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.assignment.of.receivables.in.international.trade.convention.2001/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^34. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.abolishing.requirement.of.legislation.for.foreign.public.documents.convention.1961/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^35. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.procurement.model.law.1994/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^36. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.ulis.convention.1964/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^37. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.ulf.convention.1964/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^38. Not all harmonization/ unification efforts lend themselves equally well to this approach. Transformation is more appropriate where there is necessarily a large domestic law element in the area of law concerned. In these circumstances, the legal text is more likely to be promulgated as a model law. Even here it is vital that as far as possible the text (and article numbering) remain intact. Yet other approaches are appropriate in given circumstances - e.g. where agreement is reached on part of a complex area of law and it is left to the individual States to ensure the changes are implemented; or the EU approach with directives, which member states are left to implement individually - note that in that case there is recourse to the European Court if legislation is not implemented correctly or on time.

 ^39. And to understand what it has become/ how it has been implemented.

 ^40. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/the.autonomous.contract.07.10.1997.amissah/sisu_manifest.html›

 ^41. ‹http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/autonomous.contract.2000.amissah/sisu_manifest.html›