Lex Mercatoria

www.lexmercatoria.org

www.jus.uio.no/lm

 scroll    toc    txt   pdf   pdf    odt    A-Z  Document Manifest   home 
 

Lex Mercatoria: Private International Commercial Law

Lex Mercatoria

copy @ Lex Mercatoria

Rights: Copyright ©  2004 Lex Mercatoria


Lex Mercatoria: Private International Commercial Law

Private International Commercial Law

Agency

Applicable Law (Conflict of Laws / Proper Law)

Contract Principles

"Lex Mercatoria?" Contract Principles / Commercial Codes
Transnational Law Principles - Creeping Codification
Unidroit
EU
US

Customs

Insolvency

other

Insurance

English Marine Insurance Act
Cargo Insurance

Jurisdiction and Enforcement

Arbitral Recognition and Enforcement
EU & EFTA

Limitation Periods in the International Sale of Goods

Payment Mechanisms and Guarantees

Guarantees and Payment Mechanisms
International Transfers
Letters of Credit
Guarantees
Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes
Factoring
Leasing
Assignment of Receivables
US UCC

Procedure and Evidence

Procedure
Evidence

Procurement of Goods, Construction and Services

Sale of Goods

CISG
Bibliographies:
Recommended reference texts:
ULIS & ULF
Incoterms
England
Norway
US
Other

Endnotes

Endnotes


Agency

See also Sale of Goods

Council Directive 86/653/EEC EC Directive for the co-ordination of the laws of Member States related to Self-employed Commercial Agents 1986

Status

See also

See also

Transnational Law Database at CENTRAL's Transnational Law database on rules and principles of Lex Mercatoria based on Prof. Klaus Peter Berger's concept of the Creeping Codification of Lex Mercatoria is inaugurated on October 26th 2001 at the Conference Globalization of International Business Law held at CENTRAL, Muenster University, Germany. Guest speakers include Lord Mustill.

Complete Commented version of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 2004 "The complete version of the UNIDROIT Principles contains not only the black?letter rules reproduced hereunder, but also detailed comments on each article and, where appropriate, illustrations. The volume may be ordered from UNIDROIT at ‹http://www.unidroit.org

For an update of international case law and bibliography relating to the Principles see ‹http://www.unilex.info› ."

Representing "a significant step in the globalization of legal thinking". J.M. Perillo

"The success of even binding uniform law instruments ... depends at least to a great extent, on their being brought to the attention of the potential users. This is all the more true of non-binding instruments such as the UNIDROIT Principles" M.J. Bonell

This is a copy of the official commented version of the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts prepared using the

UNIDROIT, Rome, 1994. Text without commentary.

Other Language editions

Dutch

UNILEX on CISG and UNIDROIT Principles and the product ‹http://www.cnr.it/CRDCS/unilex.htm› International Case Law and Bibliography

EU

"The Principles of European Contract are the product of work carried out by the Commission on European Contract Law a body of lawyers drawn from all the Member States of the European Community, under the chairmanship of Professor Ole Lando. They are a response to a need for a Community-wide infrastructure of contract law to consolidate the rapidly expanding volume of Community law regulating specific types of contract"

Commented version of the Principles of European Contract Law edited by Ole Lando & Hugh Beale ISBN 9041113053

For more information, write to the Secretary of the Commission, Matthias E. STORME, <matthias@storme.be>

US

US Uniform Commercial Code from the LII

US Contracts from the LII

Customs

Rather see: Customs

International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures (Kyoto, 18 May 1973) | Amending Supplement No. 13 - January 1993 World Customs Organization

other

INSOL International International Federation of Insolvency Professionals

The Insolvency Service UK Executive Agency within the Department of Trade and Industry

See also Carriage of Goods

Marine Insurance Act 1906 (English Statute - highly influential, and selected as applicable law by the Institute Cargo Clauses, (the minimum cover of which is in turn selected by default if nothing else is agreed by INCOTERMS 1990 CIF and CIP these being the only INCOTERMS which impose upon the seller an insurance obligation))

The Institute Marine Cargo Clauses A B C War and Strikes Clauses (London, 1982) Standard terms of insurance. Subject to English law - by choice of law clause.

(the minimum cover that is required by INCOTERMS CIF and CIP (A3b) if nothing else is agreed)

UNCTAD Model Clauses on Marine Cargo Insurance (Geneva, 1987)

4{! ../intellectual.property/toc.html Intellectual Property

See also Electronic Commerce.

UNCITRAL Guide to Electronic Funds Transfers

text

Leasing

text

US UCC

See also Limitation Periods

Agency

CISG

For advice on the implementation of this Convention contact

⌠Printable text⌡gopher://gopher.law.cornell.edu/00/foreign/fletcher/KAV2420.txt

See also:

"Because of the abundance of information, [on the CISG] there is a need to sort out the most helpful publications and determine the types of materials needed. Publications come in a variety of formats--print, disc, and increasingly in electronic form. These recent electronic projects represent breakthrough developments for legal researchers because they use new technologies (i.e., the Internet) and promote cooperation among scholars, practitioners, librarians, and computer specialists. Pace University School of Law is responsible for the major project in this regard. Largely due to the initiative and vision of Albert Kritzer, who is leading the Pace Project, a new tool is being created that will bring together all CISG sources and scholars. Mr. Kritzer, working tirelessly and with experts worldwide, is devoted to making the CISG better known." Claire M. Germain

CISG sites include:

CISG - International Trade Database at The Institute of International Commercial Law, Pace University, School of Law. The most comprehensive effort to chart the growing domain of the CISG, See also The Autonomous Network of CISG Websites

CISG Rabel Website University of Freiburg, Institute of Foreign and International Law

CISG France Professor Claude Witz

CISG Japan Professor Hiroo Sono, Kyushu University, Japan

CISG Finland Professor Tuula ?mm?l?, Faculty of Law, University of Turku

CISG Israel Chief Editor: Dr. Arie Reich, Faculty of Law, Bar-Ilan University

CISG Spain & Latin America Prof. Dr. Pilar Perales, University of Madrid

CISG Bibliography at CISG Database, IICL, Pace University

Uniform Law of International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention, John Honnold, Kluwer 1991

International Contract Manual Guides to Practical Applications of the [CISG], Albert Kritzer, Kluwer, 1994

ICC's Incoterms 1990 "International Commercial Terms."

England

English Sale of Goods Act 1979. (an incomplete presentation of Parts II to VII) England, usually one of the more active participants in the drafting of such Conventions (as the #CISG CISG ), is frequently one of the last States to implement them, as is the case with this Convention. See list of CISG Contracting States

England applies the earlier Uniform Law on International Sale of Goods 1964 (ULIS) to international sales, but only if adopted by the parties to such a sale.

Norway

The challenges related to the harmonization of a given area of law are many, and go beyond the important agreement of a common text. Such agreement in itself does not guarantee uniformity of application, even where the convention attempts to encourage this through its provisions on interpretation . For an excellent article placing the issues in perspective, read "Uniform Words and Uniform Application. The 1980 Sales Convention and International Practice" John Honnold.

There has been much success with the #CISG CISG and its uniform adoption (admittedly with not infrequent reservations), there being over Contracting States. On the whole, academics and practitioners the world over, can be confident that when they discuss an article of the CISG, and its interaction with other articles, they are discussing the same text, (whether or not they agree as to its meaning).  38 

It appears that Norway alone amongst the contracting States has implemented the #CISGCISG through "transformation" thought Israel notably is considering it   Neither the numbering nor the substantive provisions are the same. Obviously this means that for Norway alone amongst the contracting States it is necessary to search to find e.g. Article 74 (or any other provision of the CISG).  39  A question raised is that of the conformity of the transformed text with the original. This is supposedly ultimately taken care of by the "supremacy" clause, ( ?88 with ideas which equate to Article 7 of the CISG). As pointed out, even with identical texts, the problems that arise can be substantial. Even within Norway not everyone is agreed that this transformation is such a wonderful innovation - see for example: Kj?psrettskonvensjon, Norsk Kj?pslov og Internasjonal Rettsenhet, Tidskrift for Rettsvitenskap 4/1995 p. 569 - "et siktem?l ? pr?ve ? reversere det som har skjedd." V. Hagstr?m. Other authoritative Norwegian authors including Professor Kai Kr?ger have expressed their agreement.

It would have been extremely unfortunate for the CISG, (and mitigated considerably the success it today represents in the harmonization of international sales law), if several countries had chosen such a course of implementation.

This is no criticism of the Norwegian domestic sales law or the Norwegian Sale of Goods Act (which incidentally, is in other respects substantially the same as that of other Nordic countries), but of Norway's implementation of the CISG. From an international (harmonization of law) perspective it is a mistake which hopefully will not be repeated elsewhere.

For advice on the implementation of this Convention contact UNCITRAL. See the:

Norwegian Sale of Goods Act - CISG concordance table,

CISG - Norwegian Sale of Goods Act concordance table

Only the

The full text ISBN 82-7511-003-3 may be obtained from:

Tel. 22 60 32 90. Fax 22 69 55 93.

None of the Nordic countries implement Part II of the Convention on formation of contracts (having made

For a Scandinavian view of the CISG see:

"Understanding the CISG in Scandinavia" Joseph Lookofsky. DJ?F Publishing 1996 ISBN 87-574-7420-6

US
Other

 1.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.agency.sog.convention.1983/sisu_manifest.html

 2.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.agency.convention.1978/sisu_manifest.html

 3.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.minimum.standards.shipping.agents.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html

 4.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.sog.convention.1955/sisu_manifest.html

 5.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.sog.convention.1986/sisu_manifest.html

 6.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/ec.applicable.law.contracts.1980/sisu_manifest.html

 7.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.applicable.law.agency.convention.1978/sisu_manifest.html

 8.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.international.commercial.contracts.principles.2004/sisu_manifest.html

 9.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.international.commercial.contracts.principles.1994.commented/sisu_manifest.html

 10.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.contract.principles.1994/sisu_manifest.html

 11.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002/sisu_manifest.html

 12.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/leaving.the.shadow.for.the.test.of.practice.future.of.pecl.1999.friedrich.blase/sisu_manifest.html

 13.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.cross.border.insolvency.model.law.1997/sisu_manifest.html

 14.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.a.1982/sisu_manifest.html

 15.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.b.1982/sisu_manifest.html

 16.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.c.1982/sisu_manifest.html

 17.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.war.1982/sisu_manifest.html

 18.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/institute.marine.cargo.clauses.strikes.1982/sisu_manifest.html

 19.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.marine.cargo.insurance.all-risks.cover.1987/sisu_manifest.html

 20.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.marine.cargo.insurance.intermediate.cover.1987/sisu_manifest.html

 21.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.marine.cargo.insurance.restricted.cover.1987/sisu_manifest.html

 22.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.arbitration.recognition.and.enforcement.convention.new.york.1958/sisu_manifest.html

 23.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/ec.jurisdiction.enforcement.judgements.civil.commercial.matters.convention.brussels.1968/sisu_manifest.html

 24.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/ec.efta.jurisdiction.enforcement.judgements.civil.commercial.matters.lugano.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html

 25.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.limitation.period.sog.convention.1974/sisu_manifest.html

 26.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.limitation.period.sog.convention.1980/sisu_manifest.html

 27.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.credit.transfers.model.law.1992/sisu_manifest.html

 28.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.independent.guarantees.and.standby.letters.of.credit.convention.1995/sisu_manifest.html

 29.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/bills.of.exchange.and.promissory.notes.convention.1930/sisu_manifest.html

 30.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.bills.of.exchange.and.promissory.notes.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html

 31.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.factoring.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html

 32.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.financial.leasing.convention.1988/sisu_manifest.html

 33.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.assignment.of.receivables.in.international.trade.convention.2001/sisu_manifest.html

 34.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/hcpil.abolishing.requirement.of.legislation.for.foreign.public.documents.convention.1961/sisu_manifest.html

 35.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.procurement.model.law.1994/sisu_manifest.html

 36.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.ulis.convention.1964/sisu_manifest.html

 37.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/unidroit.ulf.convention.1964/sisu_manifest.html

 38. Not all harmonization/ unification efforts lend themselves equally well to this approach. Transformation is more appropriate where there is necessarily a large domestic law element in the area of law concerned. In these circumstances, the legal text is more likely to be promulgated as a model law. Even here it is vital that as far as possible the text (and article numbering) remain intact. Yet other approaches are appropriate in given circumstances - e.g. where agreement is reached on part of a complex area of law and it is left to the individual States to ensure the changes are implemented; or the EU approach with directives, which member states are left to implement individually - note that in that case there is recourse to the European Court if legislation is not implemented correctly or on time.

 39. And to understand what it has become/ how it has been implemented.

 40.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/the.autonomous.contract.07.10.1997.amissah/sisu_manifest.html

 41.http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/autonomous.contract.2000.amissah/sisu_manifest.html


Lex Mercatoria

www.lexmercatoria.org

www.jus.uio.no/lm

 scroll    toc    txt   pdf   pdf    odt    A-Z  Document Manifest   home 
 


Lex Mercatoria -->

( International Trade/Commercial Law & e-Commerce Monitor )

W3 since October 3 1993
1993 - 2010

started @The University of Tromsø, Norway, 1993
hosted by The University of Oslo, Norway, since 1998
in fellowship with The Institute of International Commercial Law,
Pace University, White Plains, New York, U.S.A.

Disclaimer!

© 

Ralph Amissah




Lex Mercatoria