-
Maus, Ingvill Gjerdrum & Elster, Jakob
(2024).
Hva er forskningsetikk.
[Internet].
https://film.oslomet.no/64968570/90101010/d70867f614d6c6d341.
-
-
Holst, Cathrine & Elster, Jakob
(2022).
Philosophy, Policy and Moral Expertise.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2022).
Samspillet mellom empiriske og normative premisser i utformingen av god politikk.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2020).
Bør vi ha mindre strenge samtykkekrav i helseforskningen?
Khrono.no.
ISSN 1894-8995.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2020).
Ville utsatt skoleåpning ha vært etisk forsvarlig?
Khrono.no.
ISSN 1894-8995.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2020).
Hvilken etiker skulle man stole på?
Salongen – nettidsskrift for filosofi og idéhistorie.
ISSN 2703-7053.
-
-
Elster, Jakob
(2010).
The Brain and its Law.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2010).
”You don’t know what it’s like!” –personal experience in morality and public reason.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2009).
Democratic authority in non-ideal theory: some thoughts on David Estlund’s defence of hopeless political theories.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2009).
"You Don't Know What It's Like!" - The Role of Personal Experience in Moral Argumentation.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2008).
Bioethics committees between moral epistemology and political legitimacy.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2008).
Ought implies can.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2008).
What do we explain when we explain morality?
-
Elster, Jakob
(2008).
Bioetiske komiteer – mellom etikk og politikk.
-
Elster, Jakob; Roll-Hansen, Nils & Storm, Johan Frederik
(2008).
Upop-aften: Nevroetikk.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2008).
Hvilken rolle skal moralsk motivasjon ha i velferdspolitikken?
-
Elster, Jakob & Bomann-Larsen, Lene
(2007).
Deltagelse i radioprogram om moralske intuisjoner og drap i krig, mm.
[Radio].
Verdibørsen.
-
Block, Ned; Galaaen, Øistein Schmidt & Elster, Jakob
(2007).
Empiricism in the Philosophy of Mind? An Interview with Ned Block.
[Newspaper].
Filosofisk Supplement 1, 2007, pp. 30-34.
Show summary
Metaphilosophical interview with Prof. Ned Block (NYU), 28th November 2006.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2007).
Hjerneskadete utilitarister - Hvordan fungerer vår moralske dømmekraft?
-
Elster, Jakob
(2007).
How does the mind matter for the law?
-
Elster, Jakob
(2007).
(How) Can We Draw Normative Conclusions From Empirical Work In Moral Psychology?
-
Elster, Jakob
(2006).
Legitimate Motivational Transformation.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2006).
Om å undervise i bioetikk i skolen: Hva underviser man i og hvorfor?
-
Bomann-Larsen, Lene & Elster, Jakob
(2005).
Deltagelse i radioprogram: Debatt om moralske dilemmaer og de hvite bussene.
[Radio].
Verdibørsen, NRK P2.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2005).
Umotiverte for det gode.
[Newspaper].
Klassekampen.
-
-
Elster, Jakob
(2005).
Intervju i Østlandssendingen.
[Radio].
NRK Østlandssendingen.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2005).
Intervju på P4s Helgefrokost.
[Radio].
P4s Helgefrokost.
-
-
Elster, Jakob
(2005).
Teaching bioethics in the secondary education – the Norwegian experience.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2005).
Simone Weil on the Purificational Role of Atheism and Amoralism.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2005).
Can the Level of Our Moral Motivation Influence the Content of Our Moral Duties?
-
Elster, Jakob
(2004).
Wrongful life problems and euthanasia.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2003).
Moral Motivation and Political and Social Institutions.
-
Elster, Jakob
(2007).
Transforming Moral Motivation.
Unipub forlag.
ISSN 0806-3222.
Show summary
The dissertation takes as its point of departure the supposition that when people fail to perform morally good actions, this is not only due to a lack of moral knowledge, but often to a lack of moral motivation. It follows that one way of making society better is by influencing the moral motivation of its members. If self-interest were sufficient to motivate all actions required by morality, transforming moral motivation would not be necessary, although it might still be a useful supplementary means. However, although theoretically possible, the assumption that self-interest is sufficient to motivate moral action is empirically implausible given any reasonably demanding conception of morality. Another way of arguing that the demands of morality do not require motivational transformation consists in saying that since ought implies can, I have no duty to perform an action I cannot be motivated to perform. However, although it is true that if a person at present cannot possibly be motivated to perform a given action she has no duty to perform the action, this does not mean that she does not have a duty to become motivated to perform the same action sometime in the future.
Nevertheless, there are moral limits to what we may do to transform people’s motivation. A major constraint on motivational transformation is respect for the agent’s right to autonomy. In particular, we must respect the right to an autonomous process of motivational formation: an agent should be able to choose for herself what motives she wants to develop, based on her present motivational state. The right to an autonomous process weighs even heavier than the right to autonomous action, which might sometimes be legitimately infringed, as when a criminal is imprisoned. But this right does not impose a limit on motivational transformation when we shape the moral motives of children, because they have no capacity for, hence no right to, an autonomous process.
-
Elster, Jakob & Von Troil, Helena
(2004).
How to best teach bioethics. Report from a workshop March 2003 organised by The Nordic Committee on Bioethics and NorFA.
Nordisk ministerråd.
ISSN 92-893-1005-7.