Andreas Føllesdal

• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Appreciating the Margin of Appreciation, In Adam Etinson (ed.),  Human Rights: Moral or Political?.  Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198713258.  8.  s 269 - 294
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Constitutionalization, Not Democratization, In Grossman Nienke; Grant Cohen Harlan; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  Legitimacy and International Courts.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108529570.  11.  s 307 - 337
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). The Legitimate Authority of International Courts and Its Limits: A Challenge to Raz's Service Conception?, In Patrick Capps & Henrik Palmer Olsen (ed.),  Legal authority beyond the state.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781107190269.  7.  s 188 - 205
• Grant Cohen, Harlan; Føllesdal, Andreas; Grossman, Nienke & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). Legitimacy and International Courts – A Framework, In Grossman Nienke; Grant Cohen Harlan; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  Legitimacy and International Courts.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108529570.  1.  s 1 - 40
• Squatrito, Theresa; Young, Oran R.; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals, In Theresa Squatrito; Oran R. Young; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108348768.  1.  s 3 - 36
• Young, Oran R.; Squatrito, Theresa; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). What We Know So Far, In Theresa Squatrito; Oran R. Young; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108348768.  13.  s 406 - 433
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Exporting the margin of appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law.  ISSN 1474-2640.  15(2), s 359- 371 . doi: /10.1093/icon/mox019
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Getting to justice?. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.  ISSN 1369-8230.  20(2), s 231- 242 . doi: 10.1080/13698230.2016.1183759
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Independent yet Accountable: Stress Test Lessons for the European Court of Human Rights. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law.  ISSN 1023-263X.  s 484- 510 . doi: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1023263X17729945 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Law making by law breaking? A theory of parliamentary civil disobedience against international human rights courts, In Matthew William Saul; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781316874820.  13.  s 329 - 352 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Theories of Human Rights: Political or Orthodox - Why it Matters, In Johan Karlsson Schaffer & Reidar Maliks (ed.),  Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781107153974.  4.  s 77 - 96
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Tracking Justice Democratically. Social Epistemology.  ISSN 0269-1728.  31(3), s 324- 339 . doi: 10.1080/02691728.2017.1317869
• Saul, Matthew William; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). Introduction, In Matthew William Saul; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781316874820.  Introduction.  s 1 - 18
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Building democracy at the Bar: the European Court of Human Rights as an agent of transitional cosmopolitanism. Transnational Legal Theory.  ISSN 2041-4005.  s 95- 113 . doi: 10.1080/20414005.2016.1171561
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Implications of contested multilateralism for global constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism.  ISSN 2045-3817.  5(3), s 297- 308 . doi: 10.1017/S2045381716000186
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Squaring the circle at the battle at Brighton: is the war between protecting human rights or respecting sovereignty over, or has it just begun?, In Oddny Mjöll Arnadottir & Antoine Buyse (ed.),  Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights protection..  Routledge.  ISBN 978-1-138-12124-9.  Part 2, chapter 11.  s 189 - 204
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Subsidiarity and International Human-Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights — Or Neither?. Law & Contemporary Problems.  ISSN 0023-9186.  79(2), s 147- 163 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Subsidiarity to the Rescue for the European Courts? Resolving tensions between the Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection, In Dietmar H. Heidemann & Katja Stoppenbrink (ed.),  Join, or Die - Philosophical Foundations of Federalism.  Walter de Gruyter.  ISBN 9783110426588.  Kapittel 12.  s 251 - 272 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Tsereteli, Nino (2016). The margin of appreciation in Europe and beyond. International Journal of Human Rights.  ISSN 1364-2987.  20(8), s 1055- 1057 . doi: 10.1080/13642987.2016.1258856
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Curb, Channel and Coordinate: The Constitutionalisation of International Courts and Tribunals, In Jan Wouters & Geert De Baere (ed.),  The Contribution of International and Supranational Courts to the Rule of Law.  Edward Elgar Publishing.  ISBN 9781783476619.  12.  s 355 - 369
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Democracy, Identity, and European Public Spheres, In Thomas Risse (ed.),  European Public Spheres: Politics is Back.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781107441637.  Kap.10.  s 247 - 262
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Democratic Standards in an Asymmetric Union, In Olaf Cramme & Sarah B Hobolt (ed.),  Democratic Politics in a European Union under stress.  Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198724483.  Chapter 11.  s 199 - 216

View all works in Cristin

• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2018). The Judicialization of International Law. A Mixed Blessing?. Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198816423.  288 s.
• Nienke, Grossman; Harlan, Grant Cohen; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2018). Legitimacy and International Courts. Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108529570.  388 s.
• Ryssevik, Jostein; Føllesdal, Andreas; Thorsen, Dag Einar & Aubert, Axel (2018). Politikk og menneskerettigheter. Aschehoug & Co.  ISBN 9788203403712.  440 s.
• Squatrito, Theresa; Young, Oran R.; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2018). The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108348768.  537 s.
• Føllesdal, Andreas; Ruud, Morten & Ulfstein, Geir (red.) (2017). Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati. Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 978-82-15-02212-3.  336 s. Show summary

  De internasjonale menneskerettighetene er under diskusjon både internasjonalt og i Norge. Noen mener at beskyttelsen av disse rettighetene ikke er god nok. Andre hevder at det har gått inflasjon i hva som kalles menneskerettigheter, og at det internasjonale systemet gjør store inngrep i hva som bør overlates til nasjonale demokratiske organer.

• Saul, Matthew William; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2017). The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781316874820.  403 s. Show summary

  The emerging international human rights judiciary (IHRJ) threatens national democratic processes and 'hollows out' the scope of domestic and democratic decision-making, some argue. This new analysis confronts this head on by examining the interplay between national parliaments and the IHRJ, proposing that it advances parliament's efforts. Taking Europe and the European Court of Human Rights as its focus - drawing on theory, doctrine and practice - the authors answer a series of key questions. What role should parliaments play in realising human rights? Which factors influence the effects of the IHRJ on national parliaments' efforts? How can the IHRJ adjust its influence on parliamentary process? And what triggers the backlash against the IHRJ from parliaments and when? Here, the authors lay foundations for better informed scholarship and legal practice in the future, as well as a better understanding of how to improve the effectiveness and validity of the IHRJ.

View all works in Cristin

• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018, 17. april). - Dette er en lokal demonstrasjon som utfordrer hele samfunnet. [Internett].  www.fosna-folket.no/.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). ... og for øvrig bør EMD nedlegges?. Klassekampen.  ISSN 0805-3839.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). International Courts and Tribunals: Rise and Reactions, In Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The Judicialization of International Law. A Mixed Blessing?.  Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198816423.  Forord.  s 1 - 6
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). Københavnerklæringen – opp som en løve. Morgenbladet.no.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018, 12. mars). Om vi skrev menneskerettighetene i dag.. [Radio].  NRK P2 - Studio 2.
• Føllesdal, Anderas & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). Islamske stater har også godtatt at menneskerettighetene er universelle. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).  ISSN 0804-3116. . doi: https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/BJJ6mQ/Kort-sagt_-onsdag-29-november
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). A Better Signpost or a Better Walking Stick? How to Improve the Emerging European Consensus Doctrine and Why Bother?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Are legitimacy critiques of International Courts only rhetorical rephrasing of dislikes, or can they be reasoned normative assessments?”.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Democracy and Regional Human Rights Courts: An introduction. International Journal of Constitutional Law.  ISSN 1474-2640.  15(2), s 358- 358 . doi: 10.1093/icon/mox037
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). EU-kommissær lykkønsker Østerrike med ny regjering inkludert ytterliggående FPÖ. ABCnyheter.no.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Forholdet mellom EMD og nasjonale domstoler.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Gender Inequity on the International Bench – So What? Why Be concerned – and why not.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Human Rights in Norway – toward a research agenda.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). International Legal Human Rights: Neither Minimum Standards nor Directive Ideals. Implications of a ‘Political’ Theory of Human Rights.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Not Cairns but Crutches: Emerging European consensus – why it should matter for the margin of appreciation, and how.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017, 14. juli). Om Menneskerettighetsdomstolen i Strasbourg. [TV].  NRK, Dagsnytt atten.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017, 27. november). Om #Metoo-Kampanjen og ‘outing’. [Radio].  NRK.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Reflective Equilibrium as justification and research method – Human Rights Research as Example.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Subsidiarity as a general principle of law.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The Empirical Turn in Legal Science.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The European Research Council: whither hopes and fears?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The Legitimate Authority of International Courts and its Limits: A challenge to Raz’ Service Conception?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The bias of the European Court of Human Rights against Economic and Social Human Rights: a Modest Defense.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The legitimacy critiques of international courts – beyond a taxonomy.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The roles of international and regional courts in protecting and promoting economic and social human rights: what can they do, what should they do?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Towards a more just WTO: Which justice, whose interpretation?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas; Ruud, Morten & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). De internasjonale menneskerettighetene og Norge: Spenninger og samspill, I: Andreas Føllesdal; Morten Ruud & Geir Ulfstein (red.),  Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati.  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 978-82-15-02212-3.  Innledning.  s 13 - 32
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). Truer menneskerettighetene demokratiet?. Dagens næringsliv.  ISSN 0803-9372.
• Ulfstein, Geir & Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Utfordre for å forbedre, eller for å rive ned?. Klassekampen.  ISSN 0805-3839.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). 7 Habits of Highly Reluctant Nordic States -Explanations and Challenges to Scepticism toward Judicial Review.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016, 22. desember). Bruk av sivil ulydighet. [Radio].  NRK Radio.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Constitutionalization or democratication of ICs?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Constitutionalization, not democratization of international law.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Democracy, Identity and European Public Spheres.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). European Consensus – Cairns or Crutches?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). European Identity and EU Responses to the Refugee Crisis.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016, 18. februar). Fryktar milde gåver får ein høg pris. [Internett].  Uniforum.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016, 15. desember). Global Governance. [Internett].  Global Governance Institute, University College London.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Humanistisk forskning for et samfunn i forandring.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). International Courts’ Legitimacy – a normative perspective'.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Lessons from “Lessons from judicial dialogues between the European, the African and the Inter-American Courts of Human Rights.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). MultiRights – findings.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). On PluriCourts' research on gender on the bench.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). On Sovereign Wealth Fund complicity/ disinvestment.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). On divestment from oil industry.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). On the separation of powers doctrine and International Courts.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Organdonasjon: behov og begrensninger. Aktørseminar i Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Overdriver både kritikernes innvendinger og EUs fortreffelighet. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).  ISSN 0804-3116.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). 'Regional Human Rights Courts: protecting human rights or respecting state sovereignty - or both? The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights as a model.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Subsidiarity.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). The Soul of Europe in the Balance – the conflict between the ECtHR and the CJEU.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). The legitimacy of authorities in the multi-level global basic structure: the case of International Courts.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016, 21. desember). Varsler sivil ulydighet ved gruveåpning i Finnmark. [Internett].  https://www.nrk.no/.
• Føllesdal, Andreas; Saul, Matthew William & Ulfstein, Geir (2016). Brexit truer menneskerettsvern. Dagens næringsliv.  ISSN 0803-9372.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights: a principle of subsidiarity to the rescue?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights: a principle of subsidiarity to the rescue.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). 'Brighton and Beyond: Backlashes against the European Court of Human Rights - and how to respond.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Conclusions on Proportionality.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Criteria for [parliamentary] civil disobedience of international courts.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Criteria for [parliamentary] civil disobedience of international courts: A theory of Civil Disobedience for International Law.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Does The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Benefit or Hinder the ECtHR's Contribution to Democratic Transitions?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Exporting Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2015). Fragmentation and integration for better and worse: Assessing the doctrines of a Margin of Appreciation and of the Emerging European Consensus.

View all works in Cristin