Andreas Føllesdal

• Føllesdal, Andreas (2019). A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick: How to Evaluate the European Consensus Doctrine, In Vassilis P. Tzevelekos & Panos Kapotas (ed.),  Building Consensus on European Consensus. Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in Europe and Beyond.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108564779.  9.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2019). Legitimacy Criticisms of International Courts: Not only Fuzzy Rhetoric?, In Wojciech Sadurski; Michael Sevel & Kevin Walton (ed.),  Legitimacy. The State and Beyond.  Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198825265.  11.  s 223 - 237
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Appreciating the Margin of Appreciation, In Adam Etinson (ed.),  Human Rights: Moral or Political?.  Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198713258.  8.  s 269 - 294
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Constitutionalization, Not Democratization, In Grossman Nienke; Grant Cohen Harlan; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  Legitimacy and International Courts.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108529570.  11.  s 307 - 337
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). More than meets the eye – and less: Comments on The Internationalists. Global Constitutionalism.  ISSN 2045-3817.  7(3), s 330- 341 . doi: 10.1017/S2045381718000187 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Power or Authority; Actions or Beliefs, In Karen J. Alter; Laurence R. Helfer & Mikael Rask Madsen (ed.),  International Court Authority.  Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198795582.  21.  s 412 - 421
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). The European Research Council @ 10: Whither hopes and fears?. European Political Science.  ISSN 1680-4333. . doi: 10.1057/s41304-018-0164-9 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). The Legitimate Authority of International Courts and Its Limits: A Challenge to Raz's Service Conception?, In Patrick Capps & Henrik Palmer Olsen (ed.),  Legal authority beyond the state.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781107190269.  7.  s 188 - 205
• Grant Cohen, Harlan; Føllesdal, Andreas; Grossman, Nienke & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). Legitimacy and International Courts – A Framework, In Grossman Nienke; Grant Cohen Harlan; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  Legitimacy and International Courts.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108529570.  1.  s 1 - 40
• Squatrito, Theresa; Young, Oran R.; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals, In Theresa Squatrito; Oran R. Young; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108348768.  1.  s 3 - 35 Full text in Research Archive.
• Young, Oran R.; Squatrito, Theresa; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). What We Know So Far, In Theresa Squatrito; Oran R. Young; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108348768.  13.  s 406 - 433
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Exporting the margin of appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law.  ISSN 1474-2640.  15(2), s 359- 371 . doi: /10.1093/icon/mox019 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Getting to justice?. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.  ISSN 1369-8230.  20(2), s 231- 242 . doi: 10.1080/13698230.2016.1183759
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Independent yet Accountable: Stress Test Lessons for the European Court of Human Rights. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law.  ISSN 1023-263X.  s 484- 510 . doi: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1023263X17729945 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Law making by law breaking? A theory of parliamentary civil disobedience against international human rights courts, In Matthew William Saul; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781316874820.  13.  s 329 - 352 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Theories of Human Rights: Political or Orthodox - Why it Matters, In Johan Karlsson Schaffer & Reidar Maliks (ed.),  Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781107153974.  4.  s 77 - 96 Full text in Research Archive.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Tracking Justice Democratically. Social Epistemology.  ISSN 0269-1728.  31(3), s 324- 339 . doi: 10.1080/02691728.2017.1317869 Full text in Research Archive.
• Saul, Matthew William; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). Introduction, In Matthew William Saul; Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond.  Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781316874820.  Introduction.  s 1 - 18

View all works in Cristin

• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2018). The Judicialization of International Law. A Mixed Blessing?. Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198816423.  288 s.
• Nienke, Grossman; Harlan, Grant Cohen; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2018). Legitimacy and International Courts. Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108529570.  388 s.
• Ryssevik, Jostein; Føllesdal, Andreas; Thorsen, Dag Einar & Aubert, Axel (2018). Fokus: Politikk og menneskerettar. Aschehoug & Co.  ISBN 9788203403729.  440 s.
• Ryssevik, Jostein; Føllesdal, Andreas; Thorsen, Dag Einar & Aubert, Axel (2018). Politikk og menneskerettigheter. Aschehoug & Co.  ISBN 9788203403712.  440 s.
• Squatrito, Theresa; Young, Oran R.; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2018). The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781108348768.  537 s.
• Føllesdal, Andreas; Ruud, Morten & Ulfstein, Geir (red.) (2017). Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati. Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 978-82-15-02212-3.  336 s. Show summary

  De internasjonale menneskerettighetene er under diskusjon både internasjonalt og i Norge. Noen mener at beskyttelsen av disse rettighetene ikke er god nok. Andre hevder at det har gått inflasjon i hva som kalles menneskerettigheter, og at det internasjonale systemet gjør store inngrep i hva som bør overlates til nasjonale demokratiske organer.

• Saul, Matthew William; Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (ed.) (2017). The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.  ISBN 9781316874820.  403 s. Show summary

  The emerging international human rights judiciary (IHRJ) threatens national democratic processes and 'hollows out' the scope of domestic and democratic decision-making, some argue. This new analysis confronts this head on by examining the interplay between national parliaments and the IHRJ, proposing that it advances parliament's efforts. Taking Europe and the European Court of Human Rights as its focus - drawing on theory, doctrine and practice - the authors answer a series of key questions. What role should parliaments play in realising human rights? Which factors influence the effects of the IHRJ on national parliaments' efforts? How can the IHRJ adjust its influence on parliamentary process? And what triggers the backlash against the IHRJ from parliaments and when? Here, the authors lay foundations for better informed scholarship and legal practice in the future, as well as a better understanding of how to improve the effectiveness and validity of the IHRJ.

View all works in Cristin

• Føllesdal, Andreas (2019). uio.no- bare så enhetlig som nødvendig og for øvrig mangfold. Uniforum.  ISSN 1891-5825.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Næss, Petter (2019). En konstruktiv USA-kritiker og programmet han skapte. Khrono.no.  ISSN 1894-8995.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018, 17. april). - Dette er en lokal demonstrasjon som utfordrer hele samfunnet. [Internett].  www.fosna-folket.no/.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Are concepts of legitimacy for international courts related, and how?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Better signposts or better walking sticks? How to improve the “Emerging European Consensus” doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights – and Why?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). “Comments on Peffer” Panel on Justice as fairness versus Justice as fair rights.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Current contributions of the natural law tradition to international law.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). ERC-application workshops – experiences.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Forholdet mellom EMD og nasjonale domstoler.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Human rights in ‘other’ international courts – some issues of legitimacy.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Improving the European Consensus Doctrine: A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). “Insights of Populism” Panel on populist nationalism, current international institutions, world government, or global federalism?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). International human rights in Norway: Impact, Pushback and Dialogue.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Introduction: The European Research Council @ 10—What has it done to us?. European Political Science.  ISSN 1680-4333. . doi: 10.1057/s41304-018-0163-x
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Legal secession - part of the solution to enhance minorities’ interests? The case of Ethiopian federalism.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Legal secession - part of the solution to enhance minorities’ interests? The case of Ethiopian federalism.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond? Panel on Political Philosophy.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). “Majoritarian Populism versus Minority Rights Protection – how might international courts respond?”.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Majoritarian Populism versus Minority Rights Protection – how might international courts respond?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Natural law theories and international law.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Natural law theories and international law.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). "Om teori og praksis i humaniora: Utfordringsdrevet forskning – teoretisk motivasjon eller empirisk nysgjerrighet?".
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). On PluriCourts’ Research plan.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). On The Internationalists.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). On The new legitimation challenges to international courts – and how they might respond.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). On authorship of joint publications – disciplines, hierarchy and gender.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). On the Margin of Appreciation doctrine –regional comparisons.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Protecting and Promoting Universal, European or Western European Human Rights?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Regional Human Rights Regimes: Human rights protection or respect for national and regional identities – or both.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). “Stability in ethnic territorial federations with a secession clause – challenges and opportunities in the case of Ethiopia”.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). “Stability in ethnic territorial federations with a secession clause – challenges and opportunities in the case of Ethiopia”.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Subsidiarity as a general principle of international law?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). The Comparative advantage of International Courts for ‘Global Public Goods'.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). The Significance of State Consent.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). The comparative advantages of international courts for managing global public goods.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). The significance of state consent.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). “Toward an Ethiopian Economy of Trust: the Demands for and Under-Supply of Trust in the Ethiopian Federation”.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2018). Why defer to a new MultiLateral Investment Court? – Three Themes.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). ... og for øvrig bør EMD nedlegges?. Klassekampen.  ISSN 0805-3839.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). International Courts and Tribunals: Rise and Reactions, In Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein (ed.),  The Judicialization of International Law. A Mixed Blessing?.  Oxford University Press.  ISBN 9780198816423.  Forord.  s 1 - 6
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018). Københavnerklæringen – opp som en løve. Morgenbladet.  ISSN 0805-3847.
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2018, 12. mars). Om vi skrev menneskerettighetene i dag.. [Radio].  NRK P2 - Studio 2.
• Føllesdal, Anderas & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). Islamske stater har også godtatt at menneskerettighetene er universelle. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).  ISSN 0804-3116. . doi: https://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/i/BJJ6mQ/Kort-sagt_-onsdag-29-november
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). A Better Signpost or a Better Walking Stick? How to Improve the Emerging European Consensus Doctrine and Why Bother?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Are legitimacy critiques of International Courts only rhetorical rephrasing of dislikes, or can they be reasoned normative assessments?”.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Democracy and Regional Human Rights Courts: An introduction. International Journal of Constitutional Law.  ISSN 1474-2640.  15(2), s 358- 358 . doi: 10.1093/icon/mox037
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). EU-kommissær lykkønsker Østerrike med ny regjering inkludert ytterliggående FPÖ. ABCnyheter.no.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Forholdet mellom EMD og nasjonale domstoler.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Gender Inequity on the International Bench – So What? Why Be concerned – and why not.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Human Rights in Norway – toward a research agenda.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). International Legal Human Rights: Neither Minimum Standards nor Directive Ideals. Implications of a ‘Political’ Theory of Human Rights.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Not Cairns but Crutches: Emerging European consensus – why it should matter for the margin of appreciation, and how.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017, 14. juli). Om Menneskerettighetsdomstolen i Strasbourg. [TV].  NRK, Dagsnytt atten.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017, 27. november). Om #Metoo-Kampanjen og ‘outing’. [Radio].  NRK.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). On applying to the European Research Council.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Reflective Equilibrium as justification and research method – Human Rights Research as Example.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Subsidiarity as a general principle of law.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The Empirical Turn in Legal Science.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The European Research Council: whither hopes and fears?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The Legitimate Authority of International Courts and its Limits: A challenge to Raz’ Service Conception?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The bias of the European Court of Human Rights against Economic and Social Human Rights: a Modest Defense.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The legitimacy critiques of international courts – beyond a taxonomy.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). The roles of international and regional courts in protecting and promoting economic and social human rights: what can they do, what should they do?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Towards a more just WTO: Which justice, whose interpretation?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas; Ruud, Morten & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). De internasjonale menneskerettighetene og Norge: Spenninger og samspill, I: Andreas Føllesdal; Morten Ruud & Geir Ulfstein (red.),  Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati.  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 978-82-15-02212-3.  Innledning.  s 13 - 32
• Føllesdal, Andreas & Ulfstein, Geir (2017). Truer menneskerettighetene demokratiet?. Dagens næringsliv.  ISSN 0803-9372.
• Ulfstein, Geir & Føllesdal, Andreas (2017). Utfordre for å forbedre, eller for å rive ned?. Klassekampen.  ISSN 0805-3839.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). 7 Habits of Highly Reluctant Nordic States -Explanations and Challenges to Scepticism toward Judicial Review.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016). Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?.
• Føllesdal, Andreas (2016, 22. desember). Bruk av sivil ulydighet. [Radio].  NRK Radio.

View all works in Cristin