Consent to the Jurisdiction and Applicable Law of the WTO and Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms
The research project provides a comparative analysis of the WTO and investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms approach to jurisdiction and applicable law issues.
Illustration photo: Colourbox.com
About the project
Once consent to jurisdiction has been given to a dispute settlement mechanism, to what extent does that dispute settlement mechanism continue to interpret the consent in line with what the parties intended?
This question develops particular pertinence as the issues before the dispute settlement mechanisms become increasingly complex and the dispute settlement mechanisms mature and develop their practices over time.
The project aims to consider this question in relation to the practice of the World Trade Organization (WTO) panels and Appellate Body and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) bodies.
The project focuses on the scope of jurisdiction and applicable law of these bodies over questions of 'other public international law’, which raise particular concern in today’s growing number of complex and inter-connected disputes.
The project seeks to answer the following research questions:
- What have states consented to in terms of jurisdiction and applicable law of the WTO and investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms?
- How is state consent to the jurisdiction and applicable law of the WTO and investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms interpreted in relation to questions of ‘other public international law’?
- How 'legitimate' are the approaches of the dispute settlement mechanisms?
This project is supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (project number 223274 - PluriCourts Centre) and the FRIPRO Young Research Talents (project number 274946 - State Consent to International Jurisdiction, Prof. dr. Freya Baetens).