Our research
PluriCourts studies the legitimacy of international courts and tribunals (ICs) from legal, political science and philosophical perspectives. The centre explores the normative, legal and empirical soundness of charges of illegitimacy, to understand and assess how ICs do, could and should respond.
PluriCourts explores the multidimensional
legitimacy standards which include multilevel separation of authority, independence and accountability, performance and comparative advantages. PluriCourts also aims to identify best practices and models to establish, improve or abolish ICs.
Events
- Publish with Cambridge University Press Mar. 4, 2019 12:30 PM
- Subsidiarity in the ECHR: Concept, Practice, and Legitimation Potential Mar. 6, 2019 12:15 PM
- Legal Reading Group: Backlash against international courts: explaining the forms and patterns of resistance to international courts Mar. 11, 2019 2:00 PM
- PluriCourts Lunch Seminar with Andreas Føllesdal Mar. 13, 2019 12:15 PM
Publications
- Sentencing Factors Concerning Those Most Responsible for International Crimes in Peru: An Analysis vis-à-vis International Criminal Court Sources
- Ejusdem Generis and Noscitur a Sociis
- Combating climate change through the promotion of green investment: from Kyoto to Paris without regime-specific dispute settlement
- A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick: How to Evaluate the European Consensus Doctrine
Podcasts and Videos
- Using International Criminal Law to Resist Transitional Justice: Legal Rupture in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia by Mikael Baaz
- Mass Atrocities in Syria - Does the Path to Justice Run Through Europe? by Anwar al-Bunni and Patrick Kroker
- CJEU Case Law in Swedish Courts by Johan Lindholm
