PluriCourts studies the legitimacy of international courts and tribunals (ICs) from legal, political science and philosophical perspectives. The centre explores the normative, legal and empirical soundness of charges of illegitimacy, to understand and assess how ICs do, could and should respond.
PluriCourts explores the multidimensional legitimacy standards which include multilevel separation of authority, independence and accountability, performance and comparative advantages. PluriCourts also aims to identify best practices and models to establish, improve or abolish ICs.
- The Experience of the Åbo Akademi University International Human Rights Law Clinic, Finland
- The Challenging Prosecution of Unlawful Attacks as War Crimes at International Criminal Tribunals
- Certiorari through the Back Door? The Judgment by the European Court of Human Rights in Burmych and Others v. Ukraine in Perspective
- Innføring i folkerett
- Oslo Recommendations for Enhancing the Legitimacy of International Courts: international judges take a stand on current challenges facing the international justice system Aug. 1, 2018
- Investment law leads to more investment: A faulty premise? May 30, 2018
- Déjà vu? Investment Court Proposals from 1960 and Today May 18, 2018
- Using International Criminal Law to Resist Transitional Justice: Legal Rupture in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia by Mikael Baaz
- Mass Atrocities in Syria - Does the Path to Justice Run Through Europe? by Anwar al-Bunni and Patrick Kroker
- CJEU Case Law in Swedish Courts by Johan Lindholm