PluriCourts studies the legitimacy of international courts and tribunals (ICs) from legal, political science and philosophical perspectives. The centre explores the normative, legal and empirical soundness of charges of illegitimacy, to understand and assess how ICs do, could and should respond.
PluriCourts explores the multidimensional legitimacy standards which include multilevel separation of authority, independence and accountability, performance and comparative advantages. PluriCourts also aims to identify best practices and models to establish, improve or abolish ICs.
Guest Researcher Fellowships
- Gambia vs. Myammar: Interstate litigation and accountability for mass atrocity crimes: Any potential in and for Africa? Nov. 29, 2019
- The Perils of Passivity in the Rule of Law Crisis: A Response to von Bogdandy Nov. 28, 2019
- Abuse of Process and Abuse of Rights Before the ICJ: Ever More Popular, Ever Less Successful? Oct. 16, 2019
- Using International Criminal Law to Resist Transitional Justice: Legal Rupture in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia by Mikael Baaz
- Mass Atrocities in Syria - Does the Path to Justice Run Through Europe? by Anwar al-Bunni and Patrick Kroker
- CJEU Case Law in Swedish Courts by Johan Lindholm