Please note that the disputation will be streamed.
Participate at the disputation here
Trial lecture - time and place
Adjudication committee
- Professor Beate Sjåfjell (Chair)
- Dr Todung Mulya Lubis (1 opponent)
- Professor Eva Brems (2 opponent)
Chair of defence
- Dean Ragnhild Hennum
Supervisors
- Professor Bård Anders Andreassen
- Professor Radu Mares
Summary
Indonesia’s palm oil industry is vital to the global economy and supports the livelihoods of millions. However, it faces increasing scrutiny for its impacts on human rights and the environment. This research explores how international business and human rights standards, particularly the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, align with Indonesian laws, and where both systems fall short in protecting people's rights in the industry.
Learning from International Experiences
The study also examines mandatory human rights due diligence (mHRDD) initiatives in other countries, particularly in Europe. These initiatives require businesses to proactively prevent human rights abuses and offer valuable lessons for Indonesia.
Identifying Gaps in Protection
Through a detailed case study and empirical research, the thesis highlights gaps in existing laws, enforcement mechanisms, and corporate practices in the palm oil industry. It shows how these gaps undermine the protection of workers, local communities, and vulnerable populations who are at particular risk.
Proposing a New Legal Framework
To address these challenges, the research proposes a tailored legal framework for the palm oil industry. This model integrates international standards with a collaborative regulatory approach, encouraging cooperation between government, businesses, and communities to improve accountability and safeguard rights.
Contributing to Responsible Business Practices
By offering both theoretical insights and practical solutions, the thesis supports the movement towards responsible business conduct. It emphasizes that economic growth in high-risk industries must not come at the expense of fundamental human rights.