Ole-Andreas Rognstad

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2025). Rettsliggjøring av etiske normer - noen implikasjoner illustrert ved forskningsetikkens innlemming i rettsregler om forsknings- og eksamensarbeider. In Arnesen, Finn; Lohne, Kjersti; Michalsen, Dag & Sand, Inger Johanne (Ed.), Rettsvitenskap og samfunnsengasjement: Festskrift til Hans Petter Graver. Universitetsforlaget. ISSN 9788215075297. p. 381–393. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Heimer, Astrid Maria (2025). Design og eierskap - designfaglige, estetiske og juridiske perspektiver. FormAkademisk - Forskningstidsskriftet for design og designdidaktikk. 18(1), p. 1–36. doi: 10.7577/formakademisk.5086. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  I tråd med den alminnelige rettsliggjøringen i samfunnet er det blant annet i økende grad behov for design- og kunstfaglig ekspertise i domstolene og andre tvisteløsningsorganer. I denne artikkelen diskuteres grunnleggende prinsipper for kreative prosesser og vurderinger av resultater i lys av ulike former for eierskap og rettslig regulering av disse, i den hensikt å styrke kunnskap og forståelse mellom de tre fagfeltene design, kunst og juss (IPR). Sentrale problemstillinger som tas opp er konsekvenser av dagens utvidede designbegrep, estetikkens rolle i skapende prosesser, rettslige kriterier for ulike former for eierskapsbeskyttelse og koblingen mellom de rettslige kriteriene og de designfaglige vurderingene, med vekt på estetiskfaglige vurderinger. Rettsprosessen om rettighetene til Il Tempo Gigante benyttes som gjennomgående eksempel for å illustrere generelle poenger.

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2025). Copyright Protection for Output Resulting from Use of Generative AI Systems – Some Reflections. NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. 2025(1), p. 134–144. doi: https:/www.nir.nu/en/journals/viewsection/26282. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2024). Exhaustion Revisited: And Reconstructed? In Thouvenin, Florent (Eds.), Kreation Innovation Märkte - Creation Innovation Markets. Festschrift Reto M. Hilty. Springer. ISSN 9783662685983. p. 229–249. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2024). 'Data Ownership' Ambiguity - to the Detriment of Sustainable Innovation, Promoting Sustainable Innovation and the Circular Economy. Routledge. ISSN 9781032313054. Full text in Research Archive
• Eechoud, Mireille van; Metzger, Axel; Quintais, João Pedro & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2024). Opinion of the European Copyright Society on Certain Selected Aspects of Case C-227/23, Kwantum Nederland and Kwantum België. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. ISSN 0018-9855. doi: 10.1007/s40319-024-01504-1. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The Berne Convention underscores the national treatment of foreign authors, allowing countries of the Union to protect designs through various means. Article 2(7) of the Convention (Berne) introduces a material reciprocity test, limiting copyright protection for works of applied art not protected in their country of origin. The Kwantum case (C-227/23), involving a dispute over a work of design or applied art, questions the application of the reciprocity test in the light of harmonised copyright law and the decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in RAAP (C-265/19). The Dutch Supreme Court seeks clarity on whether EU law mandates a copyright limitation through reciprocity, especially for non-EU right holders. In EU law, the Design Directive and Design Regulation govern the relationship between copyright and design protection for works of applied art. Both instruments stress the possibility of the cumulation of rights, allowing registered designs to qualify for copyright protection. Judicial harmonisation, notably in Cofemel (C-683/17) and Brompton Bicycle (C-833/18), extended the originality requirements to all works – including works of applied art – and thus limited EU Member States’ autonomy. The proposed Design Directive and Design Regulation maintain the cumulation principle, aligning with CJEU case-law on originality. In this Opinion, the European Copyright Society (ECS) does not make any pronouncement on the desirability of cumulation. On the topic of material reciprocity, the CJEU ruled in RAAP that Art. 8(2) of the Rental and Lending Directive (RLD) prohibited a Member State from excluding non-EEA performers from equitable remuneration for communication to the public of their recordings. The Court clarified that limitations to this right could be introduced only by the EU legislature and had to comply with Art. 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU). Any limitation had to be clearly defined by law. The Court emphasised that any exclusion of non-EEA right holders from remuneration must be explicit, as the right fell within the fundamental right to intellectual property of Art. 17(2) CFREU. Additionally, the Court stated that Art. 8(2) RLD should not be interpreted as granting a remuneration right solely to the phonogram producer and excluding the performer who contributed to the phonogram. The ECS criticised the potential wider implications of RAAP, proposing an alternative interpretation of the remuneration right under Art. 4(2) of the WIPO Performance and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), suggesting that it should apply only to performers towards whom a direct and unreserved obligation existed on the basis of the WPPT. The ECS also criticised the Court’s reliance on the CFREU, particularly insofar as the Court viewed harmonised rights as abstract rather than individual, thus creating uncertainty about limitations. The Court’s conclusion that only the EU legislature could limit the right for nationals of non-EU states raises concerns about the application of material reciprocity by Member States in the past, and the retroactive effects of the interpretation remain unclear, contributing to legal uncertainty. In RAAP, the CJEU interpreted the WPPT, emphasising compliance with TRIPS and the Berne Convention’s core provisions in EU law. The Court stressed that material reciprocity had to be explicit in statutory law, with only the EU legislature defining limitations under harmonised rules such as Art. 8(2) RLD. However, EU design legislation grants Member States autonomy despite harmonised concepts established in cases like Cofemel and Brompton Bicycle. Unlike in RAAP, the CJEU may have more flexibility in interpreting EU copyright law for applied art in the Kwantum case. Precedents like Cofemel and Brompton Bicycle allow the Court to interpret material reciprocity under Art. 2(7) Berne without legislative intervention. Two alternatives for the Court are to interpret Art. 2(7) as mandating material reciprocity, preventing internal market issues, or to declare Member States’ application compatible with EU law, whether they apply material reciprocity or offer unreserved national treatment to works of applied art on the basis of Art. 19 Berne. Comparing RAAP and Kwantum, material reciprocity differs under Art. 4(2) WPPT and Art. 2(7) Berne. RAAP dealt with a conditional exception, while Art. 2(7) Berne is a mandatory rule, implying that countries of the Union must deny copyright protection to works protected solely as designs and models in their country of origin. While countries can choose to set aside material reciprocity under Art. 19 Berne, if the CJEU views Art. 2(7) Berne as limiting copyright as an intellectual property right under Art. 17(2) CFREU, the requirements in Art. 52(1) CFREU are already fulfilled without legislative intervention. Applying these considerations to the Kwantum case, it is noted that Dutch law provides no more protection than Art. 2(7) Berne. Given Art. 2(7)’s precedence over domestic law in the Dutch legal order, Dutch courts must apply the material reciprocity clause unless EU law dictates otherwise. In our view, the CJEU could either recognise material reciprocity as a requirement of EU law or declare Member State rules that mirror Berne’s reciprocity clause to be compatible with EU law. In conclusion, Kwantum reflects the uncertainty stemming from RAAP. The ECS advocates for a nuanced approach to the international application of EU copyright and related rights, giving due consideration to the regulations of international conventions as part of the EU legal order. In the case of copyright protection of works of applied art, the CJEU could, as a first step, either apply the reciprocity rule set out in Art. 2(7) Berne directly, or leave it to the Member States to decide on material reciprocity or national treatment, in accordance with the principles of the Berne Convention. As a second step, the EU legislature would be well advised to address the questions raised by RAAP and Kwantum at a more fundamental level through legislative intervention.

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2024). EØS-avtalens homogenitetsmål og tredjelandsregulering -- særlig i lys av EU-domstolens dom i sak C-265/19 (RAAP). Lov og Rett. ISSN 0024-6980. p. 297–322. doi: 10.18261/lor.63.5.3. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  EØS-avtalens målsetting om like regler i EU og EØS (homogenitetsmålet) utfordres i situasjoner der EU- og EØS-reglene berører forholdet til tredjeland. Årsaken til det er at EØS-avtalen, i motsetning til EU-samarbeidet, ikke innebærer en koordinert tredjelandspolitikk. Det hindrer ikke i seg selv at EØS-avtalen inneholder regler som regulerer forholdet til tredjeland, eller at EØS-regler tolkes på en måte som får betydning for tredjelandsforhold. Homogenitetshensynet kan imidlertid ikke uten nærmere holdepunkter medføre tolkninger av EØS-regler som innebærer at EFTA-statenes kompetanse til å inngå avtaler med tredjeland blir begrenset i situasjoner der tilsvarende begrensninger ikke gjelder for EU. EU-domstolens dom i sak C-265/19 RAAP, der domstolen kom til at tredjelandsborgere hadde krav på vederlag for offentlig overføring og fremføring av lydopptak, setter spørsmålet på spissen, og blir analysert i et EØS-perspektiv.

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2024). Maglite , L ’ Oreal and RAAP. Making Sense of Third-Country Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in the EEA. In Hreinsson, Páll; Einarsson, Olafur Johannes & Pálmarsdóttir, Bryndís (Ed.), The EFTA Court - Developing the EEA over Three Decades. Hart Publishing Ltd. ISSN 9781509968800. p. 211–230. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas; Gresseth, Jon Reidar & Dahlen, Tommy (2023). Opphavsrett i moderne byggekontrakter - mitt, ditt eller vårt? In Barbo, Jan Einar & Bruserud, Herman (Ed.), Kontrakter og anskaffelser - Festskrift til Lasse Simonsen 70 år. Gyldendal Juridisk. ISSN 9788205555518. p. 313–332. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2023). Intellectual Property and the Concept of Property Rights. In Nordtveit, Ernst (Eds.), The Changing Role of Property Law; Rights, Values and Concepts. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781839100642. p. 149–160. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Nordisk opphavsrett og kulturliv i lys av internasjonal og EU-rettslig utvikling. Innledning til det XVIII nordiske opphavsrettsymposiet. NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. p. 386–388. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Repercussions of the RAAP judgment -- some introductory remarks. NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. p. 515–526. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Creations caused by humans (or robots)? Artificial intelligence and causation requirements for EU copyright law. In Pihlajarinne, Taina & Alén-Savikko, Anette (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence and the Media - Reconsidering Rights and Responsibilities. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781839109966. p. 172–191. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Ørstavik, Inger Berg (2022). Mine eller dine data? Refleksjoner rundt såkalt 'eierskap' til data. In Nordell, Per Jonas (Eds.), Magna Mater Marianne Levin 2022. Jure. ISSN 9789172238879. p. 231–245. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Revisiting the concept of ‘trade mark piracy’ in light of sustainable development goals: a discussion of the Norwegian ‘Apple Case’. In Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Ørstavik, Inger Berg (Ed.), Intellectual Property and Sustainable Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781789901344. p. 101–114. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). The Distribution Right and its Exhaustion. In rosati, eleonora (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of EU Copyright Law. Routledge. ISSN 9780367436964. p. 151–172. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Uredelig forskning - i spennet mellom juss og forskningsetikk. In Asland, John; Syse, Aslak; Wærstad, Tone Linn & Fredwall, Katrine Kjærheim (Ed.), Livsfellesskap - Rettsfellesskap Festskrift til Tone Sverdrup 70 år. Gyldendal Norsk Forlag A/S. ISSN 9788205524491. p. 63–75. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). The RAAP Case of the CJEU - What Happened to Reciprocity? In Rosenmeier, Morten (Eds.), Festskrift til Jørgen Blomqvist. Ex Tuto Publishing. ISSN 9788742000410. p. 525–548. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Ørstavik, Inger Berg (2021). Passivitet i varemerkeretten – om muligheten for å supplere varemerkelovens regler om rettighetstap med «alminnelige privatrettslige passivitetsregler». Tidsskrift for forretningsjus. ISSN 0805-4355. 27(1), p. 50–72. doi: 10.18261/issn.0809-9510-2021-01-05. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Artikkelen diskuterer hvilket rom det er for å supplere varemerkeloven med regler om rettstap som følge av passivitet på ulovfestet grunnlag. Etter varemerkeloven kan merkehavers unnlatelse av å bruke et varemerke føre til at merket kan kreves slettet, og merkehavers rett til å håndheve varemerkeretten kan prekluderes som følge av passivitet overfor en tredjepart. Reglene om bruksplikt og preklusjon er regulert gjennom EØS-retten, og det begrenser også adgangen til å supplere varemerkeloven med ulovfestede regler om rettighetstap som følge av passivitet. At bruksplikten ikke er oppfylt slik at et registrert merke kan kreves slettet, medfører at også den underliggende varemerkeretten faller bort. Dersom retten til å håndheve merket faller bort som følge av passivitet, prekluderes håndhevingskravet overfor aktuelle tredjeparter. Varemerkerettslige hensyn kan normalt ikke begrunne et fullstendig bortfall av den underliggende varemerkeretten. Dersom merkehavers passivitet etter omstendighetene utgjør konkludent adferd, er det et avtalerettslig grunnlag for en rettsendring, og rettsvirkningene må vurderes konkret.

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Performing artists’ right to remuneration – on the junction of external treaty competence, national treatment, material reciprocity and fundamental rights: RAAP. Common market law review. ISSN 0165-0750. 58(5), p. 1523–1546. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Sporting Events as Intellectual Property and Free Movement of Services - the Implication of the Premier League Case. In Senftleben, Martin (Eds.), Intellectual Property and Sports. Essays in Honour of P. Bernt Hugenholtz. Wolters Kluwer. ISSN 9789403537337. p. 291–303. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). "Accessory Exhaustion" - and Use of a Work as a Work. In Ohly, Ansgar (Eds.), Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge University Press. ISSN 9781108688529. p. 294–303. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Riis, Thomas (2020). Comment of the European Copyright Society on the Implementation of the Extended Collective Licensing Rules (Arts. 8 and 12) of the Directive (EU) 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law. 11(2), p. 101–109. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). Det nordiske ”handlingsrommet” på opphavsrettsområdet i lys av EU-/EØSretten – særlig om enerettighetene. NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. 89(1), p. 78–95. Full text in Research Archive
• Dusollier, Séverine; Benabou, Valérie-Laure; Bently, Lionel; Derclaye, Estelle; Dreier, Thomas & Geiger, Christophe [Show all 19 contributors for this article] (2020). Comment of the European copyright society: Addressing selected aspects of the implementation of articles 18 to 22 of the directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright in the digital single market. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law. 11(2), p. 132–148. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). Rimelig vederlag ved opphavsrettsoverdragelser - om åndsverkloven § 69. In Irgens-Jensen, Harald & Vislie, Camilla (Ed.), Immaterialrett, kontrakter og erstatning. Universitetsforlaget. ISSN 9788215030081. p. 148–165. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas; Geiger, Christophe; Janssens, Marie-Christine; Strowel, Alain & Xalabarder, Raquel (2019). The Delicate Scope of Economic Rights in the EU Copyright Law: Opinion of the European Copyright Society in Light of Case C-161/17, Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Renckhoff (Cordoba case) (2019). European intellectual property review. ISSN 0142-0461. p. 335–338. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas; Senftleben, Martin; Angelpoulos, Cristina; Moscon, Valentina; Peguera, Miquel & Frosio, Giancarlo (2018). The Recommendation on Measures to Safeguard Fundamental Rights in the Framework of the EU Copyright Reform. European intellectual property review. ISSN 0142-0461. p. 149–163. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3054967. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Poort, Joost (2018). The Right to a Reasonable Exploitation Concretized. An Incentive Based Approach. In Hugenholtz, Peter Bernt (Eds.), Rethinking Copyright’s Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change. Kluwer Law International. ISSN 9789041191038. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Article 65(2). Intellectual Property. In Arnesen, Finn; Fredriksen, Halvard Haukeland; Graver, Hans Petter; Mestad, Ola & Vedder, Christoph (Ed.), Agreement on the European Economic Area - A Commentary. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. ISSN 9783848732197. p. 641–658. doi: 10.5771/9783845275796-641. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas; Mähönen, Jukka Tapio & Pihlajarinne, Taina (2024). Promoting Sustainable Innovation and the Circular Economy. Routledge. ISBN 9781032313054. 222 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Arnesen, Finn; Hammersvik, Simen; Hjelmeng, Erling Johan; Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Kolstad, Olav (2022). Oversikt over EØS retten. Universitetsforlaget. ISBN 9788215025193. 718 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Ørstavik, Inger Berg (2021). Intellectual Property and Sustainable Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 9781789901344. 256 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas; Irgens-Jensen, Harald; Stenvik, Kristina; Ørstavik, Inger Berg & Østerud, Eirik (2021). Markedsrett. Innføring i markedsførings-, konkurranse- og immaterialrett. Universitetsforlaget. ISBN 9788215043289. 383 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Opphavsrett, 2. utgave. Universitetsforlaget. ISBN 9788215020990. 600 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Property Aspects of Intellectual Property. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139680318. 250 p. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Eidsvold-Tøien, Irina (2026). Rettsbeskyttelse mot deep fakes — et forsøk på et helhetlig perspektiv. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2026). Liability of GAI providers for infringing outputs – some reflections on the German GEMA cases and their impact on Nordic copyright law. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2026). The Mixed Ideological Underpinnings of Copyright Law in the AI Age. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2026). Proposisjon til endringer i åndsverkloven - noen kommentarer. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Quintais, Joao Pedro (2026). Building public AI – Copyright Harmonization or Fragmentation? Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2026). Opphavsrett og grunnleggende rettigheter i EØS. Full text in Research Archive
• Heimer, Astrid Maria & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2026). The creative space –touchpoints between design, aesthetics and intellectual property (IPR). Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  In this course, the students explore, analyze, and discuss the use of formal aesthetic principles in design processes and products. The students are to acquire knowledge and skills in creative processes based on principles and formal relations according to visual, analytical form theories, and Gestalt perception. Besides experiences and the use of visual analytical tools. Introduction to the main legal categories in intellectual property (IP-law) give the students an overview of how the various design fields connect to ownership and which category is relevant: 1) Copyright, 2) Design law,3) Patent law; questions about distinctions between form and function, and 4) Unfair competition law; including trade secret protection. Implications of AI in design and law are increasingly topical and will be brought up through the IP-law lecture. The use of AI is also part of the assignment. The aims of the course are to, (i) expand the students’ creative space in product design, and (ii) strengthen knowledge and comprehension of how to detect touchpoints between design, aesthetics and law (IP-law).

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Teilmann-Lock, Stina (2025). Creating Value Through Design and Law. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2025). Copyright and environmental sustainability. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas; Dusollier, Séverine; Mezei, Péter; Margoni, Thomas; Quintais, João Pedro & Kretschmer, Martin (2025). Copyright and Generative AI: Opinion. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law. 16(1), p. 121–127. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The ECS considers that the current development of generative artificial intelligence (AI), under the regulatory framework set up by the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM) of 2019 and the AI Act of 2024 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), leaves legal uncertainties and several open questions. The following issues require, in the view of the ECS, urgent consideration by the European Union.

• Ørstavik, Inger Berg & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2024). Er usikkerhet om rettigheter til data til hinder for en datadrevet økonomi? Full text in Research Archive
• Ørstavik, Inger Berg & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2024). Balancing access and control to drive data innovation – a law and economics approach. Full text in Research Archive
• Heimer, Astrid Maria & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2023). Creativity - Aesthetics - IPR. Full text in Research Archive
• Heimer, Astrid Maria & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Det kreative rommet – i samspillet mellom opphavsrett og kunst- og designfag. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Main effects of the CJEU decision in RAAP. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Repercussions of the RAAP Judgment (C-265/19) - Introduction. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Intellectual Property: Scope, regulations, incentives and interaction with design, art and craft. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Sustainability Perspectives on Data Ownership. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). The Copyright/Human Rights Status of Countries Associated to the EU. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2022). Upphovsrätten och den digitala konsumtionen. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Lenker, plattformer, databaser - oversikt over EU-praksis på opphavsrettsområdet i 2021. Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. p. 12–15. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Wennersten, Ulrika (2021). Gunnar Karnell, Äres dem som äras bör!, Gunnar Karnells rättsvetenskapligt syftande 39 festskriftartiklar till 38 adressater, mest till kolleger 1970–2017, NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. p. 342–358. Full text in Research Archive
• Eidsvold-Tøien, Irina & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Remunerating Authors and Performers – Are Statutory Fair Compensation Provisions Sufficient? Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  How remuneration of authors and performers have declined i the digital era in the music field

• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Ørstavik, Inger Berg (2021). Hvem eier data? Full text in Research Archive
• Fredriksen, Halvard Haukeland; Franklin, Christian; Arnesen, Finn; Bekkedal, Tarjei; Johansen, Stian Øby & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Transparency in the judicial proceedings before the EFTA Court. Full text in Research Archive
• Eidsvold-Tøien, Irina; Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2021). Remunerating Authors and Performers – Are Statutory Fair Compensation Provisions Sufficient? Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). Videresalg av e-bøker er ikke tillatt - EU-domstolens dom av 19. desember 2019 i sak C-273/18 (Tom Kabinet). Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. 22(1), p. 8–9. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). EU/EØS-rettens kilder og deres betydning for norsk rett. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). Om plagiatbegrepet i forskning. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). PhD Opposition Liliia Oprysk. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). Intellectual Property and Data Protection - Divergence or Convergence? Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2020). Norge må justere vederlagsordningen for privatkopiering, mener jussprofessor Ole-Andreas Rognstad. EUs rettspraksis kan få følger for norske rettighetshavere. [Internet]. Musikkkultur. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Opphavsrett til smaker? EU-domstolens dom i sak C-310/17 (Levola Hengelo). Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. p. 17–18. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Intellectual Property and Data Protection. Convergence or Divergence? Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Design and Intellectual Property. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Intellectual Property and the Concept of Property Rights. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Opphavsrett som eiendomsrett. Full text in Research Archive
• Heimer, Astrid Maria; Orsi, Fausto Medola, & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). “The creative space – perception, form, originality and novelty in design". Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Høyesteretts dom i HR-2019-1743-A (Popcorn Time). Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. p. 16–17. Full text in Research Archive
• Irgens-Jensen, Harald & Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2019). Tre dommer fra EU-domstolen om rekkevidden av opphavsrett og nærstående rettigheter. Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. p. 11–14. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Opphavsrett. Ny åndsverklov. Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. 20(3), p. 21–22. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Opphavsrett. Virtuelle videoopptakere - EU-domstolens dom i sak C-265/16 (VCast). Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. 20(1), p. 21–21. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Restructuring Copyright in a Time of Highly Dynamic, Technological and Economic Change. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Property Aspects of Intellectual Property. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Nordic IP. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Opphavsrett og kunstig intelligens. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Et blikk utover og fremover. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Copyright Reconstructed. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Sanctions for breach of CC Licenses. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Ownership. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). US Influence on Nordic Intellectual Property Law in Light of American and Scandinavian Legal Realism. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Når er forskningen uredelig? Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Nyheter på opphavsrettsområdet siden sist. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Høyesterett og Il Tempo Gigante - En kommentar til Rune Ljostads artikkel i NIR 2018 s. 394. NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. p. 568–586. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2018). Høyesterett og Il Tempo Gigante - en kommentar til advokat Rune Ljostads artikkel i NIR 2018 s. 394 :. NIR : Nordiskt immateriellt rättsskydd. ISSN 0027-6723. 87(4), p. 568–586. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). A 'Unitary Approach' to Online Platforms and Intermediaries Liability. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). Prop. 104 L (2016-17) – Lov om opphavsrett til åndsverk mv. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). News Aggregation and Paywalls. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). Når er lenkingen en opphavsrettskrenkelse? Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). The Right to a Reasonable Exploitation Concretized. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). The Right to a Reasonable Exploitation Concretized. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). Internasjonale rettskilder i norsk rett. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas (2017). The Nordic ECL Model. Full text in Research Archive
• Rognstad, Ole-Andreas & Irgens-Jensen, Harald (2017). Forskningsetikk. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA