Morten Nadim

• Nadim, Morten (2026). International Constitutionalism: The Impact of International Law on Constitutional Reasoning in the Norwegian Supreme Court. I Kelemen, Katalin (Red.), Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts. Hart Publishing Ltd. ISSN 9781509991549. s. 125–150. doi: 10.5040/9781509991518.ch-006. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This book explores the argumentative style of the supreme courts in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden). Its findings are based on empirical research involving 280 leading constitutional cases which demonstrate that the impact of a constitutional ruling often extends far beyond the cases actually adjudicated by the courts and that it is crucial to understand how judges justify their decisions in constitutional cases. In the cases researched, the authors identify and explain the common features of the Nordic constitutional reasoning, situating the Nordic experience within a broader comparative framework. The book compares these practices with those of non-Nordic jurisdictions, analysing whether and how the approaches of Nordic supreme courts align with each other and with global trends. This is made possible through the use of a well-established conceptual and methodological framework, adapted to the Nordic context. Key aspects of judicial reasoning are examined, including the emphasis placed on specific constitutional concepts, the use of non-legal arguments, the reliance on precedents, and the types of sources typically referenced – such as preparatory works, foreign legal materials, and academic writings. The book is aimed at anyone interested in the constitutional culture of the Nordic countries and informs normative debates on constitutional law, both in scientific and political discourse. It contributes to the global academic discourse on constitutional reasoning with a unique perspective from the Nordic countries, which have often been overlooked in comparative research.

• Kelemen, Katalin; Dahlberg, Maija; Elmerot, Åsa; Fogde, Mikael Kenno; Karlsson, Haukur Logi & Krunke, Helle [Vis alle 8 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2026). Exploring Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts Empirically: An Introduction. I Kelemen, Katalin (Red.), Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts. Hart Publishing Ltd. ISSN 9781509991549. s. 1–22. doi: 10.5040/9781509991518.ch-001. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This book explores the argumentative style of the supreme courts in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden). Its findings are based on empirical research involving 280 leading constitutional cases which demonstrate that the impact of a constitutional ruling often extends far beyond the cases actually adjudicated by the courts and that it is crucial to understand how judges justify their decisions in constitutional cases. In the cases researched, the authors identify and explain the common features of the Nordic constitutional reasoning, situating the Nordic experience within a broader comparative framework. The book compares these practices with those of non-Nordic jurisdictions, analysing whether and how the approaches of Nordic supreme courts align with each other and with global trends. This is made possible through the use of a well-established conceptual and methodological framework, adapted to the Nordic context. Key aspects of judicial reasoning are examined, including the emphasis placed on specific constitutional concepts, the use of non-legal arguments, the reliance on precedents, and the types of sources typically referenced – such as preparatory works, foreign legal materials, and academic writings. The book is aimed at anyone interested in the constitutional culture of the Nordic countries and informs normative debates on constitutional law, both in scientific and political discourse. It contributes to the global academic discourse on constitutional reasoning with a unique perspective from the Nordic countries, which have often been overlooked in comparative research.

• Kelemen, Katalin; Dahlberg, Maija; Elmerot, Åsa; Fogde, Mikael Kenno; Karlsson, Haukur Logi & Krunke, Helle [Vis alle 8 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2026). Constitutional reasoning in the Nordic supreme courts: A comparative empirical analysis. International Journal of Constitutional Law. ISSN 1474-2640. 24(2), s. 580–625. doi: 10.1093/icon/moag060. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Abstract This article presents the first comparative empirical study of constitutional rea­soning in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Drawing on forty leading constitutional cases from each of the seven examined courts, the authors apply the CONREASON method to map how arguments and key constitutional concepts are used in judicial decision-making. The study situates Nordic courts within a global comparative framework, highlighting both shared regional features and notable divergences. It shows that, despite differences in constitutional texts and institutional arrangements, the Nordic courts exhibit a distinctive combination of deference to parliamentary intent and cautious judicial review. Preparatory works occupy an unusually prominent role in constitutional interpretation, particularly in Finland and Sweden, whereas Norway and Iceland rely more heavily on precedents. At the same time, all Nordic courts display high levels of engagement with international human rights law—especially the European Convention on Human Rights—while showing limited openness to foreign influence and intra-Nordic dialogue in this field. The article also examines the use of core constitutional concepts such as the rule of law and separation of powers, revealing how their application reflects deeper legal-cultural mentalities and historical contexts. By combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, the study provides new insights into the evolving Nordic constitutional culture and its position on the global spectrum of constitutional reasoning. It concludes by discussing the potential future challenges posed by Europeanization, internationalization, and political change for the traditionally restrained role of Nordic courts.

• Nadim, Morten (2017). Den offisielle fortellingen - De norske hemmelige tjenesters virksomhet 1945-1995. I Ryymin, Teemu (Red.), Historie og Politikk - Historiebruk i norsk politikkutforming etter 1945. Universitetsforlaget. ISSN 9788215029085. s. 200–220. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2015). Forskning på personskadeerstatning i praksis. Tidsskrift for erstatningsrett, forsikringsrett og velferdsrett. ISSN 1891-8956. s. 82–101. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten & Sunde, Jørn Øyrehagen (2015). A call for more diversity: A comment to Schaffer et al. Retfærd: Nordic Journal of Law and Justice. ISSN 0105-1121. 38(1 = 148), s. 43–48. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2014). Rettsulikhet i straffeutmålingen. Tidsskrift for strafferett. ISSN 1502-685X. 14(1), s. 26–44. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2014). Large and small systems : development in argumentation in the Norwegian Supreme Court 1970-2010. Retfærd: Nordic Journal of Law and Justice. ISSN 0105-1121. 37(1 = 144), s. 3–16. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2013). Er Høyesterettsdommere politisk farget? - En undersøkelse av 17 dommeres votum i dissenssaker. Lov og Rett. ISSN 0024-6980. s. 655–672. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Artikkelen er et svar til statsviterne Gunnar Grendstad, William R. Shaffer og Eric N. Waltenburgs artikkel i Lov og Rett 2012 nr. 4, der det hevdes at dommernes yrkesbakgrunn, utnevnelsesregjering og fødested kan forklare høyesterettsdommernes voteringsmønster. Artikkelen ser på dommeradferd med kvantitativ metode for å undersøke gyldigheten av påstandene fra statsviterne. Et utvalg dommeres votum i dissenssaker mellom offentlig og privat part er analysert for å se om noen dommere i større grad voterer for enten privat eller offentlig part. Resultatene er holdt opp mot noen av dommernes objektive kjennetegn for å se om det er noen sammenheng som kan forklare dommeradferd. Artikkelen er skrevet i forbindelse med forfatterens masteravhandling om samme emne.

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Nadim, Morten (2026). Ankeutvalget - rettsutviklingens portvoktere. Universitetsforlaget. ISBN 9788215043586. 195 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Harstad, Johanne Løvli & Nadim, Morten (2024). Innføring og oppgavesamling i sivilprosess. Universitetsforlaget. ISBN 9788215068442. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2023). Precedents in the 21st century. Karnov Group Norway AS. ISBN 9788293816669. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Nadim, Morten (2025). Hvordan representere en part. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2025). Institutthistorien sett utenfra. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2025). Hvordan representere en part? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2025). Panelsamtale om "Har eg rettstryggleik". Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2024). Høyesterettsdommere foren eder. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2024). Fra skoleeksamen til mappeevaluering - omlegging av JUS4212. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2024). KI TeachMeet - Rettshistorie som eksempel. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2024). Constitutional reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2024). Constitutional reasoning in the Nordic supreme courts. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2024). Høyesterett som historikere. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2023). ChatGPT og Hjemmeeksamen. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2023). Kun det prinsipielle er godt nok - Høyesterett(er)s kontroll med forvaltningen. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2023). Høyesteretts portvoktere. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2023). Stortingsadministrasjonens rettslige stilling. Lov og Rett. ISSN 0024-6980. s. 345–346. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2022). The Norwegian Legal Culture - an overview. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2022). Nordic CONREASON: Nordiske høyesteretter som konstitusjonsdomstoler - en empirisk og komparativ studie av nordiske høyesteretters grunnlovsbruk. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2021). THE NORWEGIAN SUPREME COURT - An Institutional Overview. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2018). Sverre Flaatten: Høyesterett, straffen og tyveriene. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning (TfS). ISSN 0040-716X. 59, s. 214–217. doi: 10.18261/issn.1504-291X-2018-02-05. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2016). Personskade-erstaningsrett i praksis: Norske praktikeres syn på personskadeerstatningsretten i praksis, og på aktørene som operer i dette feltet. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Sunde, Jørn Øyrehagen & Nadim, Morten (2016). The Personal Injury Claim Process in Norway. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2016). THE NORWEGIAN PIC LAW AND SYSTEM. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2016). Hva er passe straff? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2016). Intervju om straffenivå i forbindelse med Forskningsdagene UNG. [Radio]. NRK Hordaland. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2015). Et annerledes kildemateriale. Personskadeerstatningsretten: Et høyst praktisk rettsområde. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2015). Personal injury law in practice. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2015). 200 år med Høgsterett. [Internet]. På høyden. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2015). Dommeradferd i Norges Høyesterett, Empiriske funn - en kommentar. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2014). Utpeker seg selv. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2013). Domstolene mellom rett og politikk. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2013). Large and small systems. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  How The Norwegian Supreme Court uses different types of equitable considerations in plenary and grand chamber rulings concerning individual rights versus society's desire, and need, to regulate the conduct and/ or rights of individuals in the time period 1970 to 2010

• Nadim, Morten (2013). Store og små systemer - Utvikling i argumentasjonsmønstre i Høyesterett. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2013). The social role of the Norwegian courts. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2012). Vil ha mildere straffer. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten (2012). Høyesterett i ekspropriasjonssaker 1965-2011. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Nadim, Morten & Sunde, Jørn Øyrehagen (2017). Precedents in the 21st Century. The Evolution of Case Law in the Norwegian Supreme Court 1970–2016. Universitetet i Bergen. ISSN 9788230839843. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA