Tobias Mahler

• Mahler, Tobias (2022). Regulating Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). I Custers, Bart & Fosch Villaronga, Eduard (Red.), Law and Artificial Intelligence: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice . T.M.C. Asser Press. ISSN 978-94-6265-522-5. s. 521–540. doi: https%3A/doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2_26.
• Mahler, Tobias (2022). Between Risk Management and Proportionality: The Risk-Based Approach in the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act Proposal. I Colonna, Liane & Greenstein, Stanley (Red.), Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics. ISSN 978-91-8892-964-8. s. 247–269.
• Fosch Villaronga, Eduard & Mahler, Tobias (2021). Cybersecurity, safety and robots: Strengthening the link between cybersecurity and safety in the context of care robots. Computer Law and Security Review. ISSN 0267-3649. 41. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105528. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Schwemer, Sebastian Felix; Mahler, Tobias & Styri, Håkon (2021). Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act? Oslo Law Review. ISSN 2387-3299. 8(1), s. 4–29. doi: 10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2021-01-01. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard; Felzmann, Heike; Ramos-Montero, Maria & Mahler, Tobias (2018). Cloud services for robotic nurses? Assessing legal and ethical issues in the use of cloud services for healthcare robots. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Proceedings. ISSN 2153-0858. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2018.8593591. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This paper explores ethical and legal implications arising from the intertwinement of cloud services, healthcare and robotics. It closes an existing gap in the literature by highlighting the distinctive ethical and legal concerns associated with the inter-dependence of the cyber- and the physical aspects of healthcare cloud robotics. The identified core concerns include uncertainties with regard to data protection requirements; distributed responsibilities for unintended harm; achievement of transparency and consent for cloud robot services especially for vulnerable robot users; secondary uses of cloud data derived from robot activities; data security; and wider social issues. The paper aims to raise awareness and stimulate reflection of the legal and ethical impacts on different stakeholders arising from the use of cloud services in healthcare robotics. We show that due to the complexity of these concerns the design and implementation of such robots in healthcare requires an interdisciplinary development and impact assessment process. In light of legal requirements and ethical responsibilities towards end-users and other stakeholders, we draw practical considerations for engineers developing cloud services for robots in healthcare.

• McGillivray, Kevin; Esayas, Samson Yoseph & Mahler, Tobias (2016). Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Terms? Visualising Contract Terms and Data Protection Requirements for Cloud Computing Users. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). ISSN 0302-9743. 9881, s. 39–56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46963-8_4. Vis sammendrag

  The following article evaluates two models for providing purchasers of online digital content, including cloud computing services, with visual notice of contract terms and data collection practises. Visualisation of contract terms and privacy policies has the potential to provide cloud consumers with an improved means of understanding the contract terms they are accepting when entering into an agreement with a Cloud Service Provider (CSP). The following paper examines two concrete proposals or models for the visualisation of contract terms and privacy practises as compliance tools in the European context. The article focuses primarily on consumer and data protection law. Although the visualisation models are not currently binding or legally required, they start an important conversation on how such terms can be more effectively conveyed.

• Mahler, Tobias & Solhaug, Bjørnar (2016). En konseptuell modell for ugyldighet. I Hjelmeng, Erling Johan (Red.), Ugyldighet i privatretten - minnebok for Viggo Hagstrøm. Fagbokforlaget. ISSN 978-82-450-1808-0. s. 307–335.
• Esayas, Samson Yoseph; Mahler, Tobias; Seehusen, Fredrik; Bjørnstad, Frode & Brubakk, Veda (2015). An integrated method for compliance and risk assessment. I Samarati, Pierangela & Noubir, Guevara (Red.), 2015 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), Florence, 28-30 September, 2015. IEEE conference proceedings. ISSN 978-1-4673-7876-5. s. 568–576. doi: 10.1109/CNS.2015.7346870.
• Blandhol, Sverre & Mahler, Tobias (2015). Advokaten i fremtiden. I Knudtzon, Sigurd (Red.), Å være advokat. Universitetsforlaget. ISSN 9788215025230. s. 24–60.
• Esayas, Samson Yoseph & Mahler, Tobias (2015). Modelling compliance risk: a structured approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law. ISSN 0924-8463. 23(3), s. 271–300. doi: 10.1007/s10506-015-9174-x. Vis sammendrag

  This article presents a structured and systematic approach for identifying and modelling compliance risks. The sophistication with which modern business is carried out and the unprecedented access to a global market means that businesses are exposed to increasing and diverse regulatory requirements in and across jurisdictions. Compliance with such requirements is practically challenging, partly due to the complexity of regulatory environments. One possibility in this regard is a risk-based approach to compliance, where resources are allocated to those compliance issues that are most risky. Despite the need for risk-based compliance, few specific methods and techniques for identifying and modelling compliance risks have been developed. Due to the lack of methodological and tool support, compliance risk identification often involves unstructured brainstorming, with uncertain outcomes. The proposed approach consists of a five-step process for the structured identification and assessment of compliance risks. This process aims at facilitating the identification of compliance risks and their documentation in a consistent and reusable fashion. As part of the process, the article provides a systematic approach for a graphical modelling of compliance risks, which aims at facilitating communication among experts from different backgrounds. The creation of graphical models can be partly automated based on natural language patterns for regulatory requirements. Furthermore, the structuring of the compliance requirement in a template aims at simplifying the modelling of compliance risks and facilitating a potential future automated model.

• Mahler, Tobias (2014). A gTLD right? Conceptual challenges in the expanding internet domain namespace. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. ISSN 0967-0769. 22(1), s. 27–48. doi: 10.1093/ijlit/eat018.
• Mahler, Tobias (2014). Assessing Legal Risks of Closed Generic Top-Level Domains . European Journal of Law and Technology. ISSN 2042-115X. 5(3).
• Mahler, Tobias (2014). Rechtsansprüche auf generische Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) nach der Marktliberalisierung - Eine kritische Untersuchung zentraler Begriffe des Domainnamensrechts . Juridikum (Wien). ISSN 1019-5394. s. 522–532.
• Mahler, Tobias (2013). Governance Models for Interoperable Electronic Identities. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology. ISSN 1901-8401. 8(2), s. 148–159. Vis sammendrag

  Current implementations of electronic identity in Europe are rather diverse; they include state-driven identity management frameworks as well as private sector frameworks and different forms of public-private collaborations. This diversity may represent a major challenge for the deployment of information society services addressed towards the European internal market. This raises the question: How can we achieve interoperability of electronic identities across Europe, and potentially beyond Europe’s borders? This paper argues that the interoperability of electronic identity could be governed by a multi-stakeholder governance framework that brings together different parties with interests in the provision and use of electronic identities. Such a governance framework could, for example, consist in designing and operating a portal with common functionalities that allows interoperable authentication across multiple domains and contexts. Inspiration for the governance of such a portal could come both from existing successful implementations of electronic identity and from multi-stakeholder institutions that have proven useful in Internet governance.

• Mahler, Tobias (2013). A Graphical User-Interface for Legal Texts? I Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. & Greenstein, Stanley (Red.), Internationalisation of Law in the Digital Information Society: Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics 2010–2012. Ex Tuto Publishing. ISSN 978-87-92598-22-6. s. 311–327.
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). Die Durchsetzbarkeit von Schranken-Schranken der Internetfreiheit. I Kleinwächter, Wolfgang (Red.), Grenzen der Internetfreiheit. MIND Multistakeholder Internet Dialog. CO:LLABORATORY DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES NO. 1, #3. Internet & Gesellschaft Co:llaboratory. ISSN 978-3-9503139-6-3. s. 69–72.
• Jøsang, Audun; Fritsch, Lothar & Mahler, Tobias (2010). Privacy Policy Referencing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). ISSN 0302-9743. 6264, s. 129–140. Vis sammendrag

  Data protection legislation was originally defined for a context where personal information is mostly stored on centralized servers with limited connectivity and openness to 3rd party access. Currently, servers are connected to the Internet, where a large amount of personal information is continuously being exchanged as part of application transactions. This is very different from the original context of data protection regulation. Even though there are rather strict data protection laws in an increasing number of countries, it is in practice rather challenging to ensure an adequate protection for personal data that is communicated on-line. The enforcement of privacy legislation and policies therefore might require a technological basis, which is integrated with adequate amendments to the legal framework. This article describes a new approach called Privacy Policy Referencing, and outlines the technical and the complementary legal framework that needs to be established to support it.

• Jøsang, Audun; Fritsch, Lothar & Mahler, Tobias (2010). Privacy Policy Referencing. I Katsikas, Sokratis K.; Lopez, Javier & Soriano, Miguel (Red.), TrustBus, Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business, 7th International Conference, TrustBus 2010, Bilbao, Spain, August 30-31, 2010. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6264. Springer. ISSN 978-3-642-15151-4.
• Mahler, Tobias; Ranheim, Malin Renate & Cojocarasu, Dana Irina (2010). Hvordan vurderer nasjonale domstoler datalagringsdirektivet opp mot grunn- og menneskerettigheter? I Schartum, Dag Wiese (Red.), Overvåking i en rettsstat. Fagbokforlaget. ISSN 978-82-450-1048-0. s. 149–166.
• Mahler, Tobias & Ranheim, Malin Renate (2010). Datalagringsdirektivet og den tyske grunnloven. Lov & Data. ISSN 0800-7853. s. 19–23.
• Mahler, Tobias (2009). Una definición de riesgo legal. Foro de Derecho Mercantil: Revista Internacional. ISSN 1794-0427. s. 78–113.
• Mahler, Tobias (2008). The State of the Art of Contractual Risk Management Methodologies. I Haapio, Helena (Red.), A Proactive Approach to Contracting and Law. Turku University Applied Sciences. ISSN 9789522160171. s. 57–74.
• Arenas, A; Wilson, M; Crompton, S; Mahler, Tobias; Schubert, L & Cojocarasu, Dana Irina (2008). Bridging the gap between legal and technical contracts. IEEE Internet Computing. ISSN 1089-7801. 12.
• Mahler, Tobias & Olsen, Thomas (2007). Reputation Systems and Data Protection Law. I Sudarashan, Nimma (Red.), Data Privacy and Protection : Issues and Perspectives. The Icfai University Press. ISSN 81-314-1375-6. s. 38–51.
• Vraalsen, Fredrik; Mahler, Tobias; Lund, Mass Soldal; Hogganvik, Ida; den Braber, Folker & Stølen, Ketil (2007). Assessing Enterprise Risk Level : the CORAS Approach. I Khadraoui, Djamel & Herrmann, Francine (Red.), Advances in Enterprise Information Technology Security. IGI Global. ISSN 978-1-59904-090-5. s. 311–333.
• Olsen, Thomas & Mahler, Tobias (2007). Identity management and data protection law: Risk, responsibility and compliance in "Circles of Trust". Computer Law and Security Review. ISSN 0267-3649. 23(4& 5). doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2007.05.009. Vis sammendrag

  Today, we are expected to remember a different user name and password for almost every organisation or domain we want to access on the Internet. Identity management seeks to solve this problem by making digital identities transferable across organisational boundaries. The basic idea is that the participating organisations will set up a collaboration (or circle of trust), which involves both identity providers and other service providers. However, there is a risk that identity management may reduce the users' level of privacy: can the collaborating organisations collect personal information and create a profile which includes the user's interaction with all collaborators? Who is responsible for the processing of personal data if many organisations collaborate? How can the user make informed decisions and consent to the processing of his data? This article seeks to address these issues from the perspective of European data protection law. The paper is split into two parts. This is part I, which introduces and analyses identity management with a focus on technical issues and risks to privacy. Part II will concentrate on data protection law, addressing the roles and responsibilities of collaborators and will analyse how to ensure a compliant interaction with the end-user.

• Olsen, Thomas; Mahler, Tobias; Seddon, Clive; Cooper, Vicky; Williams, Sarah & Valdes, Miguel [Vis alle 7 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2007). Privacy & Identity Management : Data Protection Issues in Relation to Networked Organisations Utilizing Identity Management Systems. Complex. ISSN 0806-1912. Vis sammendrag

  Today, we are expected to remember a different user name and password for almost every organisation or domain we want to access on the Internet. Identity management seeks to solve this problem by making digital identities transferable across organisational boundaries. The basic idea is that the participating organisations will set up a collaboration (or circle of trust) which involves both identity providers and other service providers. However, there is a risk that identity management may reduce the users' level of privacy: Can the collaborating organisations collect personal information and create a profile which includes the user's interaction with all collaborators? Who is responsible for the processing of personal data if many organisations collaborate? How can the user make informed decisions and consent to the processing of his data? This report seeks to address these issues from the perspective of European data protection law.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Generic Top-Level Domains: A Study of Transnational Private Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78643-513-2. 280 s.
• McGillivray, Kevin; Esayas, Samson Yoseph & Mahler, Tobias (2016). Give Me a Sign: Expressing Contract Terms and Data Protection Requirements Visually in Cloud Computing. Senter for Rettsinformatikk. ISBN 9788272261428. 1(2016). 20 s.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Lie, Runar Hilleren & Mahler, Tobias (2022). Et nettverk av nordiske rettskilder.
• Mahler, Tobias (2022). AI Research and Europe’s Upcoming AI Law. Vis sammendrag

  Much of the discourse regarding trustworthy AI systems has emphasised the significance of AI ethics. By comparison, this keynote will focus on the legal regulation of AI in Europe. In 2021, the European Commission proposed a new law to regulate AI in Europe, the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). An important question is what this law will mean for scientific research with an AI focus. The talk will also discuss what the law, if adopted, would imply for AI developers. Ultimately, the question is whether the AIA facilitates the creation of trustworthy AI in Europe, or whether it might limit Europe’s abilities to develop competitive AI systems.

• Bygrave, Lee Andrew; Mahler, Tobias & Lintvedt, Mona Naomi (2022). AI Act og Norges handlingsrom .
• Mahler, Tobias (2022). Nye regler om kunstig intelligens.
• Mahler, Tobias (2021). Perspectives on Cybergovernance.
• Mahler, Tobias (2021). Nytt rammeverk fra EU om kunstig intelligens.
• Mahler, Tobias (2021). Menneske mot maskin. Fordeler og ulemper ved bruken av AI.
• Mahler, Tobias (2021). Rett og roboter.
• Tørresen, Jim; Saplacan, Diana; Lintvedt, Mona Naomi; Mahler, Tobias & Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard (2021). Tutorial: Ethical and Legal Assessments Related to Robots and Systems .
• Saplacan, Diana; Tørresen, Jim; Mahler, Tobias & Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard (2021). Robots and Society: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Perspectives on Integrating Robots in the Home- and Healthcare Systems and Services (RO-SO). Vis sammendrag

  The RO-SO tutorial is a continuation of the previous tutorials regarding robots, ethics, legal, and technical aspects. The tutorial is part of the 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN 2021). It focuses on providing an overview and discussing the ethical, legal, and technical perspectives, including challenges, dilemmas, and advantages and opportunities of integrating robots as part of home- and healthcare systems and services. The following two questions will guide the overall objective for this tutorial, but these will not limit the talks: How does the meaning of good care change when we integrate robots as part of the home- and healthcare systems and services? What does good care mean when we integrate assistive robots as part of the home- and healthcare services? What are some of the ethical, legal, and technical challenges and opportunities when integrating assistive care robots in the home- and healthcare services?

• Mahler, Tobias & Schwemer, Sebastian Felix (2020). Reforming the liability of non-hosting intermediaries.
• Mahler, Tobias (2020). Regulating AI Risk.
• Aronsen, Jan Magnus; De Smedt, Koenraad; Heggland, Ingrid; Dingsør, Liv; Tronstad, Stein & Pedersen, Ole Petter [Vis alle 8 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2020). Hvordan få økt deling og gjenbruk av forskningsdata? Khrono.no. ISSN 1894-8995.
• Mahler, Tobias (2020). The intermediary liability of DNS actors.
• Mahler, Tobias (2020). Regulering av kunstig intelligens og oversikt over rettsutviklingen i EU.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Robot impact assessments: A suitable regulatory mechanism for addressing robot deception?
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Robots and Artificial Intelligence on the EU Regulatory Agenda.
• Mahler, Tobias & Eduard, Fosch Villaronga (2019). Cybersecurity Considerations for (Care) Robots.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Robot impact assessments.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Robotik, artificiell intelligens, skador och försäkringsrätten; kommentar.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Multistakeholderism in the Transnational Private Regulation of the Internet.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). The future of Law: Regulating robots and AI.
• Mahler, Tobias; Bygrave, Lee Andrew & Tørresen, Jim (2019). The VIROS Project: Vulnerability in the Robot Society.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Introduction to Robot law.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). The VIROS project: Vulnerability in the Robot Society.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Rett og roboter.
• Mahler, Tobias (2019). Rettslige problemstillinger rundt kunstig intelligens.
• Mahler, Tobias (2018). Hvordan forholder jussen seg til AI?
• Mahler, Tobias (2018). ‘ICANN Shall not Regulate’: A Critical Analysis of ICANN’s Post-Transition Regulatory Powers.
• Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard; Felzmann, Heike; Ramos-Montero, Maria & Mahler, Tobias (2018). Cloud services for robotic nurses? Assessing legal and ethical issues in the use of cloud services for healthcare robots. Vis sammendrag

  This paper explores ethical and legal implications arising from the intertwinement of cloud services, healthcare and robotics. It closes an existing gap in the literature by highlighting the distinctive ethical and legal concerns associated with the inter-dependence of the cyber- and the physical aspects of healthcare cloud robotics. The identified core concerns include uncertainties with regard to data protection requirements; distributed responsibilities for unintended harm; achievement of transparency and consent for cloud robot services especially for vulnerable robot users; secondary uses of cloud data derived from robot activities; data security; and wider social issues. The paper aims to raise awareness and stimulate reflection of the legal and ethical impacts on different stakeholders arising from the use of cloud services in healthcare robotics. We show that due to the complexity of these concerns the design and implementation of such robots in healthcare requires an interdisciplinary development and impact assessment process. In light of legal requirements and ethical responsibilities towards end-users and other stakeholders, we draw practical considerations for engineers developing cloud services for robots in healthcare.

• Mahler, Tobias (2015). Desafíos de la Privacidad Digital (panel).
• Weitzenboeck, Emily Mary; Mahler, Tobias & Jones, Andrew J.I. (2015). Introduction. Artificial Intelligence and Law. ISSN 0924-8463. 23(3), s. 197–199. doi: 10.1007/s10506-015-9171-0.
• McGillivray, Kevin; Esayas, Samson Yoseph & Mahler, Tobias (2015). Using Technology to Enhance Confidentiality and Regulatory Compliance by Design. Lov & Data. ISSN 0800-7853. 123(3), s. 21–24.
• Esayas, Samson Yoseph; Mahler, Tobias & Solhaug, Bjørnar (2015). An Integrated Approach for Compliance and Security Risk Assessment. Lov & Data. ISSN 0800-7853. 121, s. 32–35. Vis sammendrag

  Organizations that rely on ICT infrastructures need to maintain a high level of information security and protection from cyber-attacks. This is not only due to the self-interest of protecting business critical infrastructures; it is also due to laws that deal with information security. For this reason, technical and legal risks often need to be understood in combination. The RASEN project proposes an approach to integrate compliance and security risk assessment.

• Mahler, Tobias (2014). Visualisation of legal norms, Jon Bing: En Hyllest/A Tribute. Gyldendal Norsk Forlag A/S. ISSN 9788205468504. s. 137–153.
• Mahler, Tobias (2014). New Generic Top Level Domains: Legal and Economic Issues.
• Mahler, Tobias (2013). New gTLD Agreement.
• Mahler, Tobias (2013). eSociety Legal Issues.
• Mahler, Tobias (2013). Public Policy Issues Regarding New Generic Top Level Domains.
• Mahler, Tobias (2013). Vurdering av personvernkonsekvenser -- Privacy Impact Assessment.
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). From Delegation to Allocation: On the Law and Economics of gTLD Policy.
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). Internet Governance and new gTLDs.
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). Managing legal risks of new gTLDs.
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). New top-level domains: Regulatory issues, dispute resolution and rights protection.
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). Criteria for Assessing ICANN’s New TLD Program.
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). A Graphical User Interface for Legal Texts?
• Mahler, Tobias (2012). Nye Internett Toppdomener.
• Mahler, Tobias (2011). Legal Risk Assessment of Introducing a New Internet Top-Level Domain. Vis sammendrag

  Internet top-level domains such as .com, .org, .de and .uk are central for the functioning of the Internet. So far, their number has been very limited, but this will change in the proximate future. After years of discussions, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is opening up the application process for new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). Proposals are likely to include both genuinely generic names such as .music, .bike or .bank and geographic names and abbreviations such as .berlin, .paris and .nyc. In addition, several major corporations are expected to register their brand names as top-level domains. The introduction of a new gTLD is sought by many applicants in order to offer registry services in an expanding market for Internet domain names. In some cases new gTLDs may also facilitate novel and innovative business models. On the other hand, applying for a new gTLD can be quite costly, since an applicant has to disburse inter alia a substantial application fee and possible costs of an auction, in addition to start-up costs. Applicants therefore need to carefully assess and manage risks related to the project of introducing a new gTLD. From the applicant’s perspective, relevant risks can be related to the business model, to the applicant’s financial situation or to operational, technical and legal issues. The assessment of legal risks – which is the key focus for this paper – is essential for any applicant, for at least two reasons. First, it is in the interest of the applicant to identify and manage legal risks in an early phase when cost-efficient proactive action is still possible. In addition, all applicants even need to include a contingency plan in their applications, and the quality of this plan will count for the application’s success. This explicitly includes the relevance of any regulation, law or policy that might impact the project. Applicants are evaluated based on a scoring system, and in order to achieve the highest score, they must show that they have thoroughly identified the key risks and the chances that each will occur, including legal risks.

• Mahler, Tobias (2011). New generic Top-Level-Domains (gTLDs).
• Mahler, Tobias (2011). Analyse av kontraktsrisiko.
• Mahler, Tobias (2011). Rettslige krav til risikovurderinger for IDforvaltning.
• Mahler, Tobias (2011). Legal Risk Management as a Methodical Perspective on Uncertainty and Complexity.
• Mahler, Tobias (2011). Hvordan kan rettslige spørsmål integreres i en risikovurdering?
• Mahler, Tobias (2011). Datalagringsdirektivet slik tyske og rumenske domstoler har vurdert det.
• Mahler, Tobias (2010). The lawyer in 2020.
• Mahler, Tobias (2010). Juridisk risikostyring i ID-systemer: Verktøybasert kontraktanalyse.
• Mahler, Tobias (2010). Lagringsdirektivet kan koste 2 Mrd. [Avis]. Computerworld.
• Mahler, Tobias (2010). Juristisches Risikomanagement: Eine Methode zur Ergänzung rechtlicher Analysen?
• Mahler, Tobias (2009). Jurister på vei til Neandertal? Omtale av Richard Susskind: The end of lawyers? Lov & Data. ISSN 0800-7853. s. 20–21.
• Mahler, Tobias (2009). Visualising legal risk.
• Mahler, Tobias (2009). Rettslige risikovurderinger: metoder og modeller.
• Mahler, Tobias (2009). Hvordan analysere legale risikoaspekter i tillitshåndtering?
• Mahler, Tobias (2009). Legal risk management.
• Mahler, Tobias (2009). Visualising Legal Risk.
• Mahler, Tobias (2008). How can we analyze contractual risk? Contracting Excellence. ISSN 1937-9765. 1(5), s. 15–16.
• Mahler, Tobias (2008). Defining Legal Risk. I Nystén-Haarala, Soili (Red.), Corporate Contracting Capabilities : Conference proceedings and other writings. University of Joensuu, Department of Law. ISSN 978-952-219-126-7. s. 51–77.
• Mahler, Tobias (2008). A method for legal risk management, exemplified in a case study on IT outsourcing.
• Mahler, Tobias (2008). Rettslig risiko og compliance.
• Mahler, Tobias (2007). Defining Legal Risk. Vis sammendrag

  What is legal risk? This category of risk is often mentioned in the context of enterprise risk management and financial risk management. Legal risk also is a central concept in legal risk management. However, the definitions given for legal risk differ widely, and no generally accepted notion of legal risk seems to exist. The objectives of this paper are to review, systematize and analyse existing definitions of legal risk. This paper proposes a context-independent definition and classification of legal risk, based on norm theory.

• Mahler, Tobias (2007). A Case Study on Legal Risk Management in ICT Outsourcing.
• Mahler, Tobias (2010). Legal Risk Management. Developing and Evaluating Elements of a Method for Proactive Legal Analyses, With a Particular Focus on Contracts. Det juridiske fakultet - Universitetet i Oslo. ISSN 1890-2375.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin